According to recent government polls, at least 40 million Americans (who will admit it), have smoked marijuana in the last year.
Atleast 15 million Americans have smoked marijuana in the last month.
According to a Harvard Economics professor, American tax payers could see a 77 Billion dollar per year boost in government tax revenue.
Marijuana is safer than alcohol. So TAX US already!
Join the millions of Americans fighting for marijuana law reform at your local post office. On April 13th the media will be present to show all the last minute people trying to get their taxes done. What they will find is a nation of cannabis activists showing the world our numbers. Coordinate your trips to the post office by contacting your local news stations and checking out the link at the bottom of the post.
Alcohol prohibition failed just as marijuana prohibition will, but it will take just as many people fighting for change. We must put our boots on and our picket signs up. Find everyone you can to protest in front of your post office.
Visit the xCannabis.com and NORML.org for more details on ways you can further the Tax Day Protest
Also, HEMPFEST will be in Moscow ID on April 18th. Be there!
Popularity: 18%
Related posts:





{ 228 comments… read them below or add one }
I support legalizing and taxing marijuana a hundred percent. It’s the only weed policy that makes any sense to me,
Cool concept and the numbers are a nice touch, but they made me do a little snooping around the web. I found a 2000 survey that reported 1/3 of Americans didn’t drink alcohol, leaving 2/3 that do. I don’t think the Booze lobby is going to want to see their numbers change if people get to make their own legal choice. The Govt may not want to wobble a known tax base in exchange for a potential tax windfall from a much smaller group of pot smokers.
If you’re leery about the accuracy of a 9 year old survey I did find a second one from August of 2006 which reported that 64% of Americans are accustomed to consuming joy juice. That’s a whopping 2% decrease in drinkers.
I’m one of the 1/3 who doesn’t consume alcohol, nor do I use illicit drugs, i’m not into recreational unreality. But, there is a need for at least limited legalization of pot for medical purposes. It’s the only drug available to combat nausea during chemo therapy that works without side effects. This isn’t a pro medical marijuana article so I won’t pursue this line of thought, but the zero tolerance policy we’ve been faced with for over 50 years is dead wrong.
I recently made this video, because my father was dieing of cancer last year. He eventually died in December from Glimoblastoma (brain cancer).
After making the video above, I found this research showing that cannabis CURES cancer.
My mom and dad were temple Mormons, and wouldn’t even think of using something illegal. But how beneficial would it have been, if even for relief from the side effects of chemotherapy! If it were legal, my dad told me he would have tried it. And I know, it would have likely helped him immensely!
And as I stated in the first video. Check and see how many people died from marijuana usage last year.
My research shows that not 1 person died from a marijuana overdoes last year.
And only 17 people died in automobile accidents who tested positive for cannabis (aka marijuana). And many of these 17 also tested positive for other substances..
So if usage of cannabis increases, then what? If it’s legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco, AT VERY LEAST we get the tax revenue from the sales, instead of the drug cartels!
I guess this site doesn’t like my videos.
Here are some links then.
California judge makes a lot of sense:
http://xcannabis.com/2009/04/judge-says-californians-would-benefit-25-billion-per-year/
Cannabis (marijuana) kills cancer (doesn’t kill other healthy brain cells):
http://xcannabis.com/2008/12/more-information-on-the-cure-for-cancer/
And Rep. Toby Nixon of WA put through a very simple, common sense prospective on our individual rights and the purpose of government.
http://xcannabis.com/2009/02/senate-bill-5615/
Peace!
http://www.challismessenger.com/index.php?accnum=story-27-20090409
Nice story about Ms. Mitchell from Challis. She started with alcohol….then marijuana….then to crank. She describes alcohol and pot as gateway drugs for her.
She also likens her use of drugs to the belief that she wasn’t hurting anyone else. But it seems she has come to realize what a selfish act this really was and how much it not only changed her life for the worse, but it really did effect others around her who loved her. Now, I will happily acknowledge that not everyone who drinks Budweiser becomes a dope fiend…..so, don’t think I am going there….but what I am saying is that making marijuana more readily available will indeed make it easier for people to make selfish decisions that many of us will pay for months and years later.
Studies show that cannabis has less habit forming properties than chocolate, and less than caffeine!
Seriously! This gateway argument is retarded. And beyond that, regulations like alcohol has, will reduce teenage usage just like it did in Canada, Australia, and Holland.
Legalization = less teenage usage
Expert testimony about the habit forming effects of marijuana.
http://xcannabis.com/2008/09/addadhd-cannabis-remedy/
If it is not habit forming then go find something else to put in your lungs.
By the way, when we get government funded health care, will you be requesting a lung transplant or anything? If you are, I just want to state for the record that I don’t think taxpayers should pay to support your habit and bail you out of a dumb choice to ingest smoke and carcinogens into your lungs.
Just a friendly reminder from all your friends who are sick and tired of forking out cash to support the habits of people who should know better, some who do, and some who just don’t get it because smoking a bowl is their main destination in life. In other words, get a life besides promoting your own selfish need to use drugs to feel important, loved, and/or to tolerate your own existence. You don’t need dope to have a good life, and I don’t want to support “dopes” who do!
Sorry, I meant to post this video of John Morgan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KLy150NR_U
Bundy, get educated about marijuana.
Reefer madness is a failed policy!
Here is the stumper for all prohibitionists..
Why if the hemp crop (non-mind altering ’sterile’ cannabis) is so profitable that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and in 1942 the Dept. of Agriculture put out a video titled “Hemp For Victory”.
See it here: http://xcannabis.com/2009/03/hemp-for-victory/
So if hemp is such a good crop, why then is it illegal?!
Do you have any reasonable (non-reefer madness) answer for this question??
opps, I meant “George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, grew hemp”….
Paper companies…
The treehuggers may win out on that one Marcus. Some shadetree logging relatives of mine used to pull their yearly income from the still forested areas of South Eastern Ohio, filling their old 2 1/2 ton ton truck with pulp wood every day. They did it all in the name of paper, chewing tobacco and Old Grandad.
They said you needed a lot of Old Grandad to run a chain saw in those woods come the dead of winter, but they did it, truck load after truck load.
It’s true Marcus. Paper, Rope, and textile companies were all competing with hemp fiber. But paper companies ultimately orchestrated the right lobbying campaign and the rest is history… About 65 years of hemp prohibition, all in the name of GREED!
Same with marijuana. There were companies making amazing remedies with cannabis sativa (aka marijuana).
You can go to google and look up all of the different varieties of medicine that was made in the USA and sold in the USA before the 1930’s..
http://images.google.com/images?q=cannabis%20medicine%20bottle&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi
Competing medicine companies didn’t want people to be able to treat themselves with this amazing medicine. So they made it a schedule 1 drug, and did away with the amazing and safe medicine.
Now Phizer can make synthetics all day, that are toxic, deadily, and have way more nasty side effects than you’ll ever get from the peaceful herb marijuana.
And while Phizer is out killing people with their cocktails. Marijuana is killing no one.
Yet marijuana is illegal in the name of greed.
Greed from the prison system, greed from the cartels, greed from corporations that originally lobbied to make it illegal. Greed greed greed..
But what about our civil rights? Our constitution?!
My latest video on the topic:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8xxbw_tax-day-protest-marijuana-tax-and-r_news
My regular VLOG.
Bundy,
A recent study done at Harvard found that smoking marijuana reduced the size of tumors in patients with lung cancer.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070417193338.htm
Perhaps you should do a little fact-finding before spouting off about ingesting smoke and carcinogens into your lungs.
For many people, alcohol was the gateway drug because it was more readily available, especially to people of my generation. I know many folks who migrated from the stronger drug (alcohol) to the more benign, marijuana and they are healthy, active senior citizens.
Prohibition of pot is having disasterous consequences, not unlike what we saw during the 13 years of alcohol prohibition and the violence and corruption it spawned. It’s time to rethink the insanity of marijuana prohibition!
You said – “If it is not habit forming then go find something else to put in your lungs.” Is that to mean we should go find something that IS habit forming to put into our lungs? (Tobacco?) I guess I didn’t catch your drift. Your postings here tend to ramble off topic a bit so I find it hard to follow your argument and, by the way, who’s asking you to support anyone’s drug use? Did I miss something?
Conservative estimates say that we will spend about $35 million (of the $196 million corrections budget) this year in Idaho to incarcerate pot smokers. Is that money well spent? I think not.
Check out page A4 of the Idaho State Journal from April 10th (yesterday).
=)
There are many other ways to ingest weed than just smoking it. There are a number of different water bongs that reduce the carcinogens as well as vaporizors and consuming it in any number of recipes. And for those people that do choose to smoke it, they aren’t inhaling a fraction of the carcinogens that are found in cigarettes or cigars. Marijauna these days is much more potent than it was back in the 60’s & 70’s, so much less is needed to be consumed in order to get the desired effects.
Ok Slu, I’m going to change the the tenor of this thing for just a little bit. I’ve stated before that I don’t use booze or illicit drugs now, but when I was younger I spent almost 15 years with my nose stuck half way up my connections butt so I’d be certain to be able to score another bag of reefer when the time came to replentish my supply.
On a weekly basis I was buying plump 3 finger bags. Those equaled just a little over an ounce of pot, and I was only smoking 4 or 5 joints a day. I wouldn’t have been able to function if I’d been smoking more.
I know pot smokers haven’t changed that much since I quit almost 30 years ago, but pot prices have increased by as much as 600 – 700%. And don’t tell me about this stuff being stronger. I was smoking the same product out of Northern California, and Columbia that’s on the street now. I know people down south that are still smokin and they say nothin’s changed, so we must have been getting really good dope while the rest of you, or your fathers, were smoking Mexican dirt weed.
I remember my feelings about reefer before I quit, it was non addictive, didn’t hurt anyone, if you were arrested you’d committed a victimless crime, everyone should have the right to get high if they wanted to, alcohol was worse for you than pot, it went on and on.
I didn’t really have any original arguments about pot. I just knew that when I smoked, everything slowed down and I didn’t have to put up with the crap the world spent all it’s time throwing at me. Every time someone came up with what sounded like valid reason for why pot was a good thing I’d put it into my little pro pot schpeel and use it on any redneck beer drinker who thought I was hippie scum for smoking weed.
Truth was that I just wanted to get high. It was that way before I finished my first doob, and the same as I smoked my last almost 15 years later.
The reason I quit is a whole ‘nother story, but the fact that I smoked for so long and stopped makes it imperative that I ask you a question.
Is all this promotion you’re doing really being done because you have a heartfelt cause you believe in, or are you, like like I was, just in the process of parroting other peoples words, and looking forward to your next bowl?
See, you don’t seem to be articulating your own thoughts in your last video. It’s just a regurgitation of the same old line NORML has been spouting for years.
untwisted -
I am a business owner, a father of 2, and a contributor to many charitable organizations.
When I was a kid I smoked pot to deal with a lot of teenage issues, including and not limited to, depression, anxiety, anger, and hormones… And of course the social aspect.
I became a Christian, got married, had children.. Then after not smoking pot for about 7 years, I started getting cluster headaches. I tried Imitrex, midrine, and a variety of over the counter stuff. After those left me feeling like crap I got thinking about cannabis.
The same reason cannabis helps glaucoma patients, is the same reason it helps my cluster headaches. The marijuana takes the pressure off the blood vessels and relieves the pressure around it. Relieving the pressure, relieves the pain.
Since moving to Idaho, I have stopped consuming cannabis, because it is not legal here.
I am fighting for legalization because marijuana was the only medicine the relieved my pain fast, effectively, and with little side-effects.
Here is a video that I made about it last year:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfp25vJZ_5k
You don’t have to like my reasons, or accept them as valid.
The point is, if I am not infringing on someone’s life, liberty or property, then I am inline with the constitution. It’s a civil right.. Not something to be morally regulated by a church or a government. WE AREN’T IN CHINA HERE PEOPLE!
Also untwisted..
As far as the “just wanting to get high”. SO WHAT?!
Some people just want to eat chocolate, which is much more dangerous and addicting than marijuana.
Don’t patronize me with your goodie-tooshooes crap, you aren’t going to get through to me about preaching from your high horse son.
I smoke cannabis every day for 5 years. I gave my life to Jesus one day, and quit completely cold turkey. I didn’t smoke for 7 years. I started up again last year to combat my aweful headaches. Then we bought a house in Idaho. I quit cold turkey again!
I don’t fat people who have a harder time going on a diet. I know smokers who simply can not quit smoking, drinkers that can’t quit drinking, and people who are on prescription medication who have a much harder time getting off their prescription.
Should we outlaw, chocolate, soda pop, food, and prescription medicine because they are more harmful, and more addicting?
I mean, someone CAN eat themselves to death. But marijuana smokers have never yet been able to smoke themselves to death.
Just because you have a weak, addictive personality, doesn’t mean that you aren’t also some fat slob that can’t stop eating chocolate. Or some pill popper who can’t stop going to the doctor for another prescription of pain killers or sleeping pills.
Yes, some people are weak, and have addictive personalities.
But out of all things to be “addicted” to. Marijuana is by far the least harmful of them all.
That is, IF I was concerned about your moral high horse. But since you seem to be stuck way up there, I thought I’d give you something to think about.
Peace!
OPPS. I should have used spell/grammar check up there.. Lets try again.
Also untwisted..
As far as the “just wanting to get high”. SO WHAT?!
Some people just want to eat chocolate, which is much more dangerous and addicting than marijuana.
Don’t patronize me with your goodie-tooshooes crap, you aren’t going to get through to me by preaching from your high horse son.
I smoked cannabis every day for 5 years. Then, I gave my life to Jesus one day, and quit completely cold turkey. I didn’t smoke for 7 years. I started up again last year to combat my awful headaches. Then we bought a house in Idaho. I quit cold turkey again!
I know fat people who have a harder time going on a diet. I know smokers (tobacco) who simply can not quit smoking, drinkers that can’t quit drinking, and people who are on prescription medication who have a much harder time getting off their prescription.
Should we outlaw, chocolate, soda pop, food, and prescription medicine because they are more harmful, and more addicting? (than cannabis)
I mean, someone CAN eat themselves to death. But marijuana smokers have never yet been able to smoke themselves to death yet.
Just because you have a weak, addictive personality, doesn’t mean that you aren’t also some fat slob that can’t stop eating chocolate. Or some pill popper who can’t stop going to the doctor for another prescription of pain killers or sleeping pills.
Yes, some people are weak and have addictive personalities.
But out of all things to be “addicted” to. Marijuana is by far the least harmful of them all. And scientific studies show that marijuana is non-addictive.
That is, IF I was concerned about your moral high horse. But since you seem to be stuck way up there, I thought I’d give you something to think about.
Peace!
Good video, slu2. You’re fighting the good fight.
Untwisted…4 or 5 joints a day? That’s at least four or five times more pot than I ever smoked in a day. Question: Were you also a drinker during your pot years? If so, did you binge drink yourself into oblivion on occassion?
I grew up around tokers and we seldom took more than two or three tokes after lighting up. Like yourself, we just did it to get high, but in my case not so high that I couldn’t cope with most situations. I’m also a tea drinker but usually don’t have more than two or three cups a day. If I have more than that the caffeine kicks me up a notch and I feel “wired”.
I’m guessing by your last post that we are probably fairly close in age. I’m just curious as to your reasons for completely quitting the herb. Was it that you smoked so much of it on a daily basis that it was affecting your productivity? Was it interfering with your home life (marriage?) to the point that you felt the need to change? Like I say, I’m just curious and trying to compare myself to fellow users like yourself who have taken the time here to relate about past experiences with pot..
I always enjoy reading your thoughts, thanks much for contributing.
BTW- This comment was out of line:
“That is, IF I was concerned about your moral high horse. But since you seem to be stuck way up there, I thought I’d give you something to think about.”
And Im sorry. I get a little edgy when I have so many Mormon friends and neighbors who give me these un-common anecdotes about how aweful marijuana was to someone that they know..
These un-common anecdotes are the same things that were displayed in the government propoganda film “Reefer Madness”.. And that show has been shown to be COMPLETELY dishonest scientifically and even anecdotally. The kinds of people you see on reefer madness, are fiends who will do ANYTHING to get their next fix…. Kind of like what untwisted is describing.
But I have NEVER EVER known a pot head to have done this “spent almost 15 years with my nose stuck half way up my connections butt so I’d be certain to be able to score another bag of reefer when the time came to replentish my supply”
I know some people who REALLY like marijuana. But never have I witnessed anyone completely sacrificing their dignity like that. What he is describing, is almost as bad as a crack head prostituting themself for crack!!!
My point is that ‘untwisted’ sounds almost identical to reefer madness. And honestly, you are the first person that I have ever met like that. Is this reality, or internet fiction? I don’t know.. All I know, is you are a rare breed. And I apologize for talking condensendingly like that to you.
Hope to see you on Tax Day my neighbors!!
BTW- See this link if you want to see the actual “reefer madness”.. It’s so wrong, it’s funny!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6696582420128930236
(1 hour)
Thanks meso!
I think you completely misread untwisted’s post.
I was mostly responding to the anecdote that he used from his life experience. And yes, I probably did misread it. Internet conversations are hard like that, because without a face to face conversation, it’s only words, no expression.
Sorry if I misread it twisted.
sorry.. I mean untwisted.
Or see, this is something that is difficult to interpret. To me it sounds condescending, and offensive. To you maybe not:
“Is all this promotion you’re doing really being done because you have a heartfelt cause you believe in, or are you, like like I was, just in the process of parroting other peoples words, and looking forward to your next bowl?”
And that wouldn’t be so bad, except for this:
“See, you don’t seem to be articulating your own thoughts in your last video. It’s just a regurgitation of the same old line NORML has been spouting for years.”
And since untwisted wanted to know, and since I just noticed, I haven’t fully presented my reasons as he requested.
There are many reasons that I support marijuana legalization. In that video that I last presented: ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfp25vJZ_5k )
I started using cannabis again last year because of my headaches. And cannabis was the most effective medicine I could find, and it didn’t make me feel like dirt after taking it. Plus, it’s the safest medicine that I know of.
Second biggest reason, is that last December my dad lost his battle with brain cancer. I believe marijuana would have improved his quality of life while he was suffering. And cannabis has been proven to be a strong cancer fighter.
RE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJcVr0GLsEA
Third reason, and a lesser reason. But when I was a teen I was treated with very hard core, toxic, mind altering drugs to treat my ADHD. Ritalin mainly.
I developed a dependence to amphetamine as a result, and I struggled with it for many years, as things like Ritalin are VERY addictive.
There is very substantial research that shows cannabis can deal with ADHD more effectively, and with less side effects. I would do anything to erase that part of my life when I was hooked on prescriptions as a young teenager.
See this video for more information on that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS2sUbG10Wo
And then for the world, the world that my children will inherit. I want them to have a clean, safe, and prosperous future. And 77 billion dollars into our economy per year, along with all of the ecosystem that will be saved by using hemp instead of trees, and hemp instead of petroleum products.. The benefits are countless quite honestly.
You are basically asking if “you are for real”. Or are you just mimicking someone else?
Dude, I have been denied that ability to carry on a family tradition of serving in the military because I got arrested for possession of a HARMLESS PLANT!
860,000 other people last year alone were arrested for simple possession of a plant, who probably suffer economic problems as a result, and most likely end up draining tax dollars because they end up on welfare, or in prison because of possessing a harmless plant.
That is bad for the pot smokers, and it’s bad for tax payers.
We need to end the futile war on drugs. We need to tax and regulate marijuana. And take the control and the money back from the cartels who have been profiting billions of dollars off our inane drug war!!
This is no plan for our future. This current drug war will not help my children, or my children’s children. The drug war will utterly destroy this country if it continues!
LOL, Slu, my man, you get a little touchy there don’t cha? A little touchy and WAY defensive. Big guy, if you want to get high, just say so. It’s no problem to me. By the way, we used to watch Reefer Madness while we were getting loaded and munching out. We thought it was hilarious.
I’m not on a high horse, I just sometimes wonder why it is that people will tap dance around their primary reason for pursuing a cause, when it would serve them better to up and be honest about their motives.
I’m not even going to start picking your last few posts apart Slu, I’ll be satisfied by saying that you continue to post other peoples words through their videos, and when you do try to articulate your own ideas you aren’t capable of restating the same facts from one post to the next.
And no, I hate to crush you assumption, I’m not a Mormon, in fact I don’t have any religious affiliation, other than there’s probably a god out there somewhere and he’s way too busy to give a hoot about what’s going on here on this old dirt ball.
Meso, Good question. Answer, no, not really. I had a couple nasty episodes with alcohol at parties in high school and they left a lasting impression on my mind. Anything that could make me that sick wasn’t going to be a big part of my life. I’d have an occasional scotch with friends, or glass of wine, but no, I was never a person that went looking for my party in a bottle. And beer has to be the most foul beverage that’s ever been thought up.
As to the amount I smoked, as time goes by, you develop a tolerance to THC or any other drug you take. If I’d started out by smoking 4 or 5 doobs a day I’d have spent the day immobilized. After 15 years of constant use 4 or 5 doobs a day is about the same thing as a group of friends sharing a couple joints at an all day concert.
As to why I quit, bud had definitely affected my ability to keep my life on an even keel. I was seriously second guessing myself because I worked in a profession where people placed their trust and in me, and I couldn’t see why they should anymore. I could write a story on this topic, but this isn’t the place or time for it. Let it suffice to say the cost got high before I woke up to the fact that my life had to change.
Thanks for the question Meso, it gave me a chance to wrap up a couple loose ends.
1. These answers are my own. Using cannabis over prescription medication. ANY DAY
2. I truly lost my dad on December 30th 2008, and his quality of life would have been much better with cannabis.
3. I never assumed you were a Mormon. But you sure do sound like one. These reefer madness anecdotes are weak.
4. Just because OTHER people did quality research, does not mean I am forbidden from using it. It isn’t an intellectual deficiency to use someone elses research. Top researchers do it all of the time.
And your condescending tone, and dismissive attitude only shows me that you aren’t willing to intellectually deal with this issue.
These statement right here is you again being on your high horse. Assuming that I am concealing the real reason that I support cannabis legalization.
1. In my video I did clearly state that I have used, and would use cannabis in recreation (if it were legal) as well as medicinally.
Watch this one again incase you missed something.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8xxbw_tax-day-protest-marijuana-tax-and-r_news
So implying that I am trying to conceal anything, or as you put it “people will tap dance around their primary reason for pursuing a cause”..
You say: “Big guy, if you want to get high, just say so.”
I did. And Wednesday I will be out in front of the post office with a sign saying so.
Instead of addressing the science that I presented, you go for the emotional instead. The problem here, is that you have not contributed anything worth while to this conversation at all son.
With all the information you gave in your last video the least you could have done is tell us what immanent domain is. If you can’t recognize the humor in that statement you’re lost to the THC that’s stored away in your brain. My intellectual discussion would begin there, so we’ll just drop it, because it’s all from medical research.
In all sincerity, I’m very sorry to hear about your fathers passing. I lost my dad about 21 years ago, and a brother with AIDS followed him about 6 months later. It may take awhile for you to get past this. I remember going off at the slightest provocation for many months after the deaths, I hope you wont be affected as long as I was. Be good to yourself Slu, and learn to let little “discussions” like the one we’ve been having fall to the wayside. Nothing’s worth getting this jacked up about.
I know it’s none of my business, but talk to your dad. I still talk to mine when I’m doing stupid stuff like mowing the grass trimming bushes and shoveling snow.
Good luck on tax day.
You can see the problem:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090316001228AAzqpEx
And I believe the solution is 77 billion per year from legal cannabis in our economy.
But when YouTube limits videos to 10 minutes, that means I either have to cut it short, or post the video on a lesser viewed website like Daily Motion.
And you’re right, I get worked up about this subject.
I am risking a lot to see this agenda get some attention.
I am a successful business man, of a fairly young company that has been going strong since 2003.
I am a father of 2, and we just had our second baby 2 weeks ago.
I have a wife, a house, and a lot of family that I don’t want to let down. But this issue is very important to me.
So I got prepared. I got rid of all of my prohibition paraphernalia, I smoked the rest of my stash, and I have been staying away from my much needed medicine so that I can do what I am doing right now.
This is not some whim, or some regurgitation of someone elses ambitions and research. I have spent countless hours on this, and spent a small fortune on a website, hosting, and advertising. Meanwhile, I suffer with headaches with little relief.
So when you started asking me very condescending questions such as:
“Is all this promotion you’re doing really being done because you have a heartfelt cause you believe in, or are you, like like I was, just in the process of parroting other peoples words, and looking forward to your next bowl?
See, you don’t seem to be articulating your own thoughts in your last video. It’s just a regurgitation of the same old line NORML has been spouting for years.”
Maybe your intent wasn’t to offend. But I feel that I have given plenty, and will sacrifice more, and it’s not just because Im “parroting other people’s words” for sniffs and giggles.
My 16 year old brother died from prescription medication in 2002, which he was given to treat depression. Which is another thing that cannabis is good a treating without the common side-effect of death.
This was shortly after I found Christ as my personal savior, and I wanted to be a good little Christian, and a good example to my little brother. He asked me one day “hey man, do you want to smoke this with me”.
I took the nugget, I put it in my pocket, and I said. “You know I’d love to. Let me think about it bro”.
The next day I gave him back his pot. Told him “sorry”.
The next week, he got another prescription for anti-anxiety. (not sure which either drug was anymore, I just know they are bad voodoo).. And marijuana is very good at treating anxiety too.
A week after that, he was dead. He had taken the correct amount of both medications, and he had taken some cold medicine for some congestion at about midnight. By 5am he was dead, died in his sleep as a result of complications from his medicine.
With Utah leading the nation in prescription drug usage, 2 to 1 of the national average. And with Utah also having the highest teen suicide rates in the nation. I have given plenty of thought to how things could have been different.
If my brother could have got a prescription for a common herb called marijuana, one of the safest ‘drugs’ in the world. He would not be dead right now.
And with the growing knowledge of cannabis’ cancer fighting properties, and ability to relieve the symptoms caused by chemo. And with it’s awesome ability to take care of my headaches.. Etc etc etc…
Well yes, this is a very sensitive issue for me.
I have more reasons for legalizing marijuana than I can count. And if this was entirely a selfish thing, than I would do as about 40 million other Americans do. I would keep it quite, and I would keep using it without any protest.
But I quit using it, to be able to live in Idaho, and to be able to protest these silly and unjust laws.
And sorry for jumping all over you. I am just tired of these same old, un-scientific, and realistic anecdotes of people losing everything because of pot. Or some how having pot screw everything up. Blah blah blah.
Tell that to Michael Phelps. 15 gold metals, and a pot smoking bong ripper!!!
Correction (I wish we could edit our posts for a few minutes after they are posted)..
“And sorry for jumping all over you. I am just tired of these same old, un-scientific, and realistic anecdotes of people losing everything because of pot. Or some how having pot screw everything up. Blah blah blah.
Tell that to Michael Phelps. 15 gold metals, and a pot smoking bong ripper!!!”
I meant to say : “ And sorry for jumping all over you. I am just tired of these same old, un-scientific, and UN-realistic anecdotes of people losing everything because of pot. Or some how having pot screw everything up. Blah blah blah..”
Like I said, tell that to Michael Phelps, or Willie Nelson, or Barrack Obama for that matter. What other famous tokers can we mention? Regardless, reefer madness is a thing of the past (almost). Thanks be to G-d!
Untwisted,
I chuckled when you mentioned you still talk to your father so many years after his passing. I too, talk to my dad when driving, shoveling snow, etc. and he’s been gone for more than 29 years.
Like slu2, I probably had ADHD, although not clinically diagnosed, in the days before it was defined as such…I was just the hyperactive kid who couldn’t sit still in class and was easily bored. I suppose that’s why pot and I got along so well together later on, it slowed me down to the point that I could focus on a task without going in several directions at once (the same reason that cocaine never interested me, it just made things worse).
After coming home from Viet Nam, I found myself drinking more than I needed to and out of necessity I had to cut down or risk my marriage and any future I had. Pot came to the rescue. While I used alcohol to mask inner turmoil, I found that pot helped me confront those feelings and work them out. I can honestly say that pot saved my marriage and probably my sanity in those post war years.
Should pot be legalized? Certainly…and I wish slu2, and his cause, much success.
I find this whole thing very interesting. I know that most of you think that I’m one of those conservative wackos. Yes, I am conservative, but in no way would I consider myself a wacko. I guess to prove my point, let me state my opnion about this whole legalizing cannabis thing.
I think it should be legalized. But only as a medication. I agree, there are many studies out there that show that it isn’t addictive or harmful. I agree with that. But for it to be used recreationally, I don’t thnk that that should be allowed. And I don’t think that way because of morality or religious views. I think that it can be harmful if used the wrong way, just as I think that alcohol and tobacco should be illegal.
For those that used it to help them cope with issues in your life, I am not going to say what I would really like to say. I just want to say that everyone needs to figure out what works for them in their own lives. All I can say is, you need to consider others that are involved in your life. Any decision in life will affect those around you.
There are many things out there that can be used for good or for bad.Just be honest with yourself. Trust your insticts, and don’t forget to listen to that voice in your head that has helped you in tough situations. Trust your own insticts.
Yes, I think that addiction to food, soda, and chocolate are real issues. But once again, I think that it is something that individuals need to deal with and not be criticized by others.
As far as legalizing cannabis, I am all for it as long as it is just for medical purposes.
As for kids using it, I think that once again parents need to step up and be responsible and be good examples. Love your children and be open and honest with them. Don’t avoid the tough questions, and make sure that they know that they can talk to you about anything without freaking out. I know that this can solve a lot of problems.
This is a video memory I made for my dad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGSsZKa5yxk
He was one of the bravest, smartest, strongest men I ever knew at one time. I still talk to him too. Probably always will.
Thanks everyone for your insight, and anecdotes (pro and con).
My dad taught me one thing. Don’t start something that you don’t intend on finishing to the end.
This has been something that has strengthened my marriage, and my relationship with my kids, and even my business.
I will see marijuana legalized, and I won’t stop until I die.
Marijuana legalization will save our country. For that I have no doubt. That 77 Billion per year in our economy will fund future generation (my children, and their children, etc)..
And us holding close to our constitution, and the promise of LIFE, LIBERTY, and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
We are like leaves in the wind, blowing to and fro. But if we stop, and think about the wonderful gift our forefathers gave us. I think it would help us to see that when we take the rights away from one group or another. We are taking the rights away from everyone in some way.
If pot smokers are not hurting anyone. If marijuana is not killing anyone. And if legalization could save our economy. What more is there to think about??????
And my4sons. I see your sincerity. But think about it. Prohibition didn’t work in the 1920’s and 1930’s. So no matter how wonderful you think life would be when everything is prohibited. Think about the gangs, the black market, the mexican cartels. And compare that to alcohol prohibition.
People don’t stop using the illicit substance because it’s illegal. It seems that they use MORE. And as a result the black market grows stronger and stronger.
ANYONE who supports prohibition. Supports.
1. A black market in our society
2. Gangs and gang violence
3. millions of people being locked up in prison for possessing a plant. (20 million marijuana arrests)
4. Mexican cartels making billions, and bringing violence into our country.
And the list of negatives goes on and on.
Prohibition didn’t work for alcohol. And it is destroying our country now with marijuana being the target..
Thanks for engaging me in this conversation. See ya Wednesday at the post office!
Meso, love ya man!
“There are many other ways to ingest weed than just smoking it. There are a number of different water bongs that reduce the carcinogens as well as vaporizors and consuming it in any number of recipes”
This is one of the funniest gems this site has ever produced. Reminds me of that line from Pineapple Express.
I thought 4-5 joints a day was a bit much myself. I know people that have been smoking for 30 years and still don’t smoke that much. 1-2 joints at the very most. Sounds like you were smoking that mexican dirt weed you spoke of untwisted. You can build up a tolerance with any drug, but when used moderately as with anything else, its much safer than any other drug out there. Sounded like you were out to stay high all day back in those days. I can see how that would affect your life and those around you. The same would be true with any mind altering substance.
I’ll have to give some thought about whether I’m going to let your cheap shots bother me……… nope, not gonna happen.
Just a thought to ponder, how often do you hear of a violent alcohol fueled fight, how often do you hear of drivers being killed due to drunk drivers?
How many fights do you hear about that are pot fueled? how many people have been killed per capita due to pot? ive never smoked it, but its a great way to end a recession!
Just a side note, those of us who smoke a drink, we pay more for taxes for schools, roads etc etc, so i think we can consider ourselves more then welcome to state funded welfare, what exactly do non-smokers non-drinkers and non-gamblers do to help fund the schools as much as those who practice the bad habits regularly?
untwisted, I have to agree with guest, and this isn’t a personal attack. I can sincerely say that I have never smoked as much as 5 joints a day, or 1/8th.. Not to myself. I mean a few times I smoked an 1/8 with a few friends at a party. But I’m a WAY light weight. And that is truth.. And I feel no need to compete in that area either. The less I have to smoke, the less I have to spend. And I like to get irie, but it has never taken more than a half a joint for me to get lit. Anymore than ‘lit’ is too much for me.
Tom I agree. I think that a pot high is a very conscious and in control feeling, just relaxed a bit. I’ve never felt the urge to fight or get pissed off at someone while I’ve been stoned.
And although I see your logic about paying taxes on recreational expenses. I for one will fight like hell before I ever consider government help, or parental help, or whatever.. I know you were making a philosophical point, but some nosy people would assume that means you are a welfare case or something.
On the contrary, pot smokers are often the hardest working people that I know.
There will be people who are lazy people before they smoke pot, and there will be the same lazy people who are lazy after smoking pot. But it’s not the pot’s fault that they are lazy, or crazy, or whatever. People have problems without medication, or illicit substances all of the time.
It’s often that the medication, or like in meso’s case, and my own case, the pot (or whatever medication) is the balancing factor in our lives.
What meso said about his life is very similar to my own. I am a better man when Im relaxed, and focused on my family. Not when Im going in 20 different directions because of ADHD symptoms. The pot really helps my ADHD..
I wish I could get Marinol for ADHD until we make pot legal here!!
:c)
Well Slu, I can take it from Guest because he’s doing nothing more than trying to make trouble, and responding to that kind of baiting from a resident troll isn’t something I’m prone to do.
But you and I had this discussion going, and it was apparent to me that you were emotionally unstable and therefore unable to continue it without popping that mass of
blood vessels that creates the headaches that you say you have to use medicinal marijuana for.
So now you’re the worlds light weight pot smoker extraordinaire, one who doesn’t smoke more than half a joint at a time. You’ve alternated between attack mode and
passive do gooder so many times that I can’t believe it. You’re just a chameleon with a cause and you’ll agree with anyone who waves your flag even a little.
My next step in our discussion was going to be presenting some medical facts about the long term effects of smoking pot. Now that you’ve reopened the door, we’re going to take a look at them.
This first point is speaking about psychological addiction which is a problem that most smokers deny exists. Pot isn’t physically addicting, but is IS psychologically addicting, and when you can’t get something off your mind it’s awful hard to stay away from it.
Addictive Potential
Long-term marijuana abuse can lead to addiction; that is, compulsive drug seeking and abuse despite its known harmful effects upon social functioning in the context of family, school, work, and recreational activities. Long-term marijuana abusers trying to quit report irritability, sleeplessness, decreased appetite, anxiety, and drug craving, all of which make it difficult to quit. These withdrawal symptoms begin within about 1 day following abstinence, peak at 2–3 days, and subside within 1 or 2 weeks following drug cessation.
**Budney AJ, Vandrey RG, Hughes JR, Thostenson JD, Bursac Z. Comparison of cannabis and tobacco withdrawal: Severity and contribution to relapse. J Subst Abuse Treat, e-publication ahead of print, March 12, 2008.**
——————————————————————————
Effects on Daily Life
Research clearly demonstrates that marijuana has the potential to cause problems in daily life or make a person’s existing problems worse. In one study, heavy marijuana abusers reported that the drug impaired several important measures of life achievement including physical and mental health, cognitive abilities, social life, and career status. Several studies associate workers’ marijuana smoking with increased absences, tardiness, accidents, workers’ compensation claims, and job turnover.
**Gruber AJ, Pope HG, Hudson JI, Yurgelun-Todd D. Attributes of long-term heavy cannabis users: A case control study. Psychological Med 33(8):1415–1422, 2003.**
——————————————————————————–
Not surprisingly, marijuana intoxication can cause distorted perceptions, impaired coordination, difficulty in thinking and problem solving, and problems with learning and memory. Research has shown that marijuana’s adverse impact on learning and memory can last for days or weeks after the acute effects of the drug wear off. As a result, someone who smokes marijuana every day may be functioning at a suboptimal intellectual level all of the time.
**Pope HG, Gruber AJ, Hudson JI, Huestis MA, Yurgelun-Todd D. Neuropsychological performance in long-term cannabis users. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58(10):909–915, 2001.**
———————————————————————————
I find the rest of this information interesting because there are no direct citations available. They come from one of the Pro Pot Websites, they give the reported bad effect and the suggested way to avoid having that effect cause any problems for you. Amazing, just amazing.
http://www.allpotseeds.com/bad-effects-of-pot.html
Short time bad effects of pot
Here are short time effects of pot, meaning during a few hours after use. The short-term effects occur rapidly after a single dose and disappear within a few hours. Most of them can be fun if You are in safe place with good people to laugh with. Most of those bad effects can be very dangerous if the place and situation demands capabilites You have just weakend by pot use and/or the people around You are not friendly. General advice is to plan ahead, prepare the right time, place and people. Good plan will help You relax, enjoy the experience and avoid bad effects of pot, which in my humble opinion are exagerrated. But always use pot with caution, if You are not experienced don’t smoke too much at the first time.
- bad short time memory and lowered learning abilities.
Example: difficulty to stay on topic, because of forgetting what was the subject and what was said a moment ago.
Comment: Some potheads like me say it is a part of fun. Sure it is when You are among friends in a safe place. But not when You have to talk to Your mother or the policeman.
- difficulty thinking and problem solving.
Example: Don’t use pot before the exam or driving lesson. These tasks need quick thinking and You are likely to fail or even put Yourself in danger. Remember to take it easy after using pot. No duties, no difficulties. Plan a enjoyable experience for Yourself.
- poor performance, loss of coordination and risk of injury.
Example: This is serious ! Don’t sharpen knifes, Don’t go climbing ! Go walking, looking, smelling, touching
- inability to drive safely or do complex tasks for up to 24 hours after use.
Example: Selfexplanatory. Daydreaming behind the wheel can be dangerous not only to Yourself, but everybody with You.
- distorted senses of sight, hearing, touch, time, and depth.
Example: Just keep in mind not to trust Your senses in 100%. Not sure You can cross the street ? Check again !
- reduced athletic ability.
Example: Don’t go wood choping or running. Work in the garden if You like …
- elevated heart rate.
Example: If You find Your heart pounding too strong just relax.
- anxiety, panic attacks.
Example: Not likely, but just in case, or if You are nervous person, or just got scared, use Your pot in a safe place with relaxed helpfull people to help You calm down. And most of all for all of You panickers, if You happen to smoke too much, and start feeling bad in any way, remember to lay down or sit down and relax and I assure You will feel better in a few hours.
Long time bad effect of pot
There is some evidence from human studies that long-term pot use can have bad effects, although it seems that the spectrum of these effects is narrower than previously thought and mainly centres around cognitive (intellectual) function. These effects disappear gradually after pot use stops. Long-term effects occur after
repeated use over a period of time. Like smoking a few joints a week for 10 years.
- because the tar content of THC smoke is 50 percent higher than that of tobacco, many users have chronic bronchitis and other respiratory problems. That can be avoided by using vapouriser instead of smoking pot. – some chronic heavy users(especially young ones less than 16 years old) may show loss of drive and energy, slow and confused thinking, impaired memory and apathy. This is often referred to as “amotivational syndrome,” and disappears gradually after drug use stops. – there is no conclusive study, but it is advised not to use pot during pregnacy. Possible cause of lower birth weight and slower brain cognitive functions development. – psychological addiction is possible and happens among heavy users.
———————————————————————————-
Slu, I’m done with this conversation. Go ahead and rant, and throw around your Reefer Madness accusations, but the above information is TRUE. Nothing you or anyone else on this site can say will make any of these FACTS false. Neither do any of these facts make alcohol or tobacco any less dangerous. They just PROVE that pot is another dangerous drug we don’t need to be legalizing. Shouldn’t we have learned something by the mistakes we already made with booze and tobacco?
Good bye Slu.
Either side should see that legalization is the key to their goals. Those who want it legalized will have it so. Those who want people to not smoke it will have it so as the state and national governments raise the taxes on it until no one can afford it anymore just like cigarettes. If you can’t outlaw it, tax it into oblivion.
Scratch – people can brew their own beer, and they sure as hell can grow their own weed, too.
Untwisted,
Most of the reading I do is of a scientific nature and a few of my favorite scientists have been cannibis users, ie., Richard Feynman, Carl Sagan and Stephen J. Gould. Sagan, an avid marijuana smoker, credited pot with much of the scientific insight that inspired his work. Stephen J. Gould, a prolific scientific writer and the originator of “punctuated equilibrium”, wrote his most detailed work, “The Structure of Evolutionary Theory”, while using pot to alleviate the nausea produced by his chemotherapy treatments for cancer. Pot certainly didn’t impair those guy’s cognitive abilities. On the contrary, perhaps we’d have more Nobel laureate scientists, yes, even more gold medal olympic swimmers if we ended the prohibition.
Pot mimics the brain’s own endogenous cannabinoid, anadamide. Anandamide was isolated by an Israeli scientist, I think around 1993 or so. This brain chemical aids in sorting out and prioritizing the signals the brain receives from the senses. It, in effect, deletes the information that’s of little import to one’s consciousness, meaning you don’t need to remember the color of the dress that the waitress was wearing yesterday or the name on the tag of the UPS delivery man this morning. So yes, pot does effect short term memory, but many users I’ve read about and known, have reported increased creativity and focus while using pot.
I’m still having trouble with accepting you as a bona fide pot smoker. I’ve been around a long time and I never recall anyone, and I mean anyone, who claimed to smoke 4 or 5 joints a day for 15 years. I am beginning to suspect, especially from your last post, that you are pulling our leg here. That’s a shame because you came across as legitimate up until the last post with those studies that reeked of distortions. You made smoking pot sound like a bad acid trip.
Remember, 42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot–Sorry ’bout that–I couldn’t resist a little humor.
I can vouch for him.
Okay Marcus, maybe he is legit, but it seems to this observer that he threw the baby out with the bath water when he (and I’m assuming, here) quit pot (alcohol and other drugs?), 30 years ago. And my gawd, as he says, ONLY 4 or 5 joints a day…Was he a walking zombie for 15 years? He just needed to limit his high times to special occasions and that should not have included the sun rising in the sky every day.
Six of one, half dozen of another Meso. You’re fighting for legalization and taxation of ganj, not responsible smoking practices. His point was that weed isn’t completely harmless, which is what seems to be the main premise of this push toward legalization. Weed is dangerous in the same way that guns are dangerous, let’s at least agree on that.
As for my opinion…legalize it and tax the hell out of it. As long as you can beat the street price, you can make a profit off of taxes. Once there is no competition from street product, jack the taxes up some more. Those that really appreciate it will carry on, those that don’t will drop off.
All in all, it really doesn’t matter much to me. Kicked that habit quite a while ago. But it would be nice to see the cops have to find another easy target, or keep more worthy criminals locked up longer.
Marcus, legalization and criminalization don’t change a users inclination to abuse pot or any other substance and there will always be folks who will smoke four or five joints a day or consume a quart of vodka a day or wolf down a quart of ice cream at a sitting. In a free society we allow for failure just as we reward for success. Sometimes it’s a roll of the dice as to the choices that folks make but they are choices we all have a right to make on our own, with or without, big brother’s approval.
Thank you for regurgitating my comment (#53) and translating it to Meso / JP friendly language! I forget how damn hard to understand I am to you normal folk!
Marcus,
My point was that, yes, weed is not always harmless, nor are many of life’s indulgences. I wouldn’t compare it to guns, although. Guns really do kill people. And, yes, I am fighting for legalization in the full knowledge that there will always be those who will be irresponsible in their use of it. That was my point…sorry if it sounded redundant to your own comment.
No, you misunderstood that I am for taxation. I am not. Certainly not on plants you can grow and process from your own garden. Processed joints akin to a pack of cigarettes at the local pharmacy? Yeah tax the hell out of ‘em.
Ugh, guns. It’s the one that pulls the trigger / mishandles a firearm, not the firearm itself. Just like it’s the guy taking a puff, not the bong or the grass.
We’re still on the same page other than the gun thing Meso, surprisingly.
Marcus,
I own my share of guns and use them frequently, so don’t try to make me sound like someone opposed to them.
“Weed is dangerous in the same way that guns are dangerous, let’s at least agree on that”.
Those were your words, not mine.
Alright, I see what you are saying now, but I wasn’t expecting the response because I wasn’t going for “people get killed” but rather “people do stupid things and end up hurting themselves or others”, LOL. What a tangled web we weave.
Shame on you Meso. You know very well that only 37.8% of statistics are made up on the spot.
You’re more than right, history is filled with important people who used drugs. Freud was a cocaine addict, he wrote extensively about it.
Think Meso, I wrote that I smoked for 15 years. In the next paragraph I was smoking 4 to 5 joints a day. Don’t you wonder how many years it took for me to progress from being a casual user who only smoked occasionally, to becoming a heavy user who smoked more than anyone you’ve ever met? No way did I smoke that much for 15 years, the last 5 years, for sure.
Don’t try to judge me by what you’ve experienced in your life Meso. We come from very different places when it comes to life experience.
This thought of defending myself as a “bonifide pot smoker” is hilarious, and once again, shame on you for even throwing that on out there.
Have you ever heard of DUID Meso? It’s something like DUI but then it’s not. They use zero tolerance DUID in Utah. With zero tolerance DUID if you get pulled over by the cops and they think that just maybe you might be a little befogged, they can urine test you. If you test with any illicit drug metabolites in your system, you’re getting arrested for DUID even though you’re stone sober. DUID is prosecuted just like a DUI.
Marijuana metabolites stay in your system for up to a week. So, if you smoke a joint at home on Tuesday and drive to Salt Lake on Saturday, you’d better hope a cop doesn’t pull you over and have you pee in a cup because you accidentally drove your car in a suspicious fashion.
At last count 10 states were using zero tolerance DUID laws. Not that it really matters if you quit smoking dope 25 years ago.
As far as the data in my last post, it all came from the same place Slu2’s information came from. The internet, and we all know, that if you read it on the internet it’s the truth.
The bad acid trip inference you’re talking about, I laughed my butt of when I found it because it’s on a PRO pot website. Click the link and check it out for yourself.
My number one community service right now is this, if you’re still smokin I don’t mind, if I could handle it I’d be toking up with you, but my experience has shown me that I can’t handle reefer anymore. if you’re going to head south through Utah, give yourself a full week to clean up before you go. If they stop you for anything, they’ll hit your eyes with a light and if your pupils don’t react the way a poorly trained officer thinks they should, you will be peeing in their cup, and you will be arrested if you test with metabolites.
The mechanics of legalization terrifies me. I remember when possessing less than 1oz of pot was made a misdemeanor in California, but if you crossed the border into Nevada and they found a seed in your pocket you were going to jail on a felony drug charge.
Enough. This subject has even tired me out.
This all boils down to that pesky “free will” thing. People are going to do what people are going to do, and bless Darwin’s little heart, some people will not survive.
The only real debate is how this situation can be resolved to be of the most benefit to the most people. I say legalize it, tax the hell out of it, and the people that are inclined to hurt themselves will do so.
You simply cannot save everyone from themselves, it is futile.
Alice – You keep ending arguments! Good job!
I’ll second that. Thanks Alice.
“But you and I had this discussion going, and it was apparent to me that you were emotionally unstable and therefore unable to continue it without popping that mass of
blood vessels that creates the headaches that you say you have to use medicinal marijuana for.
So now you’re the worlds light weight pot smoker extraordinaire, one who doesn’t smoke more than half a joint at a time. You’ve alternated between attack mode and
passive do gooder so many times that I can’t believe it. You’re just a chameleon with a cause and you’ll agree with anyone who waves your flag even a little. ”
Yeah, I get passionate about marijuana legalization. That’s no secret. And when a “troll” as you call them, start spouting of anecdotes that are not scientifically valid, and not anything that any other pot smoker on this site has experienced, then I go on as you call it “attack mode”, I call it “setting the record straight”. Im not going to let your completely unique experience sway me is all.
And as far as being the “worlds light weight pot smoker extraordinaire”. It’s all about control. Using in moderation. You obviously didn’t have this ability, and like I said you are one of few.
Marijuana doesn’t cause this craze of having people glued to their dealers butt’s like you so eloquently painted a picture of what I consider a crack head addicted to their crack habit…. But again, you are one of few.. Which is why I set the record straight.
If setting the record straight about something that I am passionate about, is “being unstable”, so be it!
I’ve witnessed people often get WAY more passionate about throwing a pig skin around, and getting muddy….
And saving our economy and releasing millions from an un-constitutional incarceration is WAY more important than some dumb game on TV.
And again, as for you anecdotal information that you provide. If it’s all this bad, then we are really in trouble. Bill Clinton, George W., and Barack Obama have ALL admitted to smoking marijuana. Obama claims he smoked it “frequently”. And then there is the GREATEST Olympian of all times who is a pot smoker. So go give your anecdotes to Michael Phelps, or our last 3 presidents. Because I have already shot these anecdotes down with modern science.
Peace!
Sorry, that last post was from me: SLU2. I wasn’t signed in apparently.
untwisted said:
“But you and I had this discussion going, and it was apparent to me that you were emotionally unstable and therefore unable to continue it without popping that mass of
blood vessels that creates the headaches that you say you have to use medicinal marijuana for.
So now you’re the worlds light weight pot smoker extraordinaire, one who doesn’t smoke more than half a joint at a time. You’ve alternated between attack mode and
passive do gooder so many times that I can’t believe it. You’re just a chameleon with a cause and you’ll agree with anyone who waves your flag even a little. ”
I say:
Yeah, I get passionate about marijuana legalization. That’s no secret. And when a “troll” as you call them, start spouting of anecdotes that are not scientifically valid, and not anything that any other pot smoker on this site has experienced, then I go on as you call it “attack mode”, I call it “setting the record straight”. Im not going to let your completely unique experience sway me is all.
And as far as being the “worlds light weight pot smoker extraordinaire”. It’s all about control. Using in moderation. You obviously didn’t have this ability, and like I said you are one of few.
Marijuana doesn’t cause this craze of having people glued to their dealers butt’s like you so eloquently painted a picture of what I consider a crack head addicted to their crack habit…. But again, you are one of few.. Which is why I set the record straight.
If setting the record straight about something that I am passionate about, is “being unstable”, so be it!
I’ve witnessed people often get WAY more passionate about throwing a pig skin around, and getting muddy….
And saving our economy and releasing millions from an un-constitutional incarceration is WAY more important than some dumb game on TV.
And again, as for you anecdotal information that you provide. If it’s all this bad, then we are really in trouble. Bill Clinton, George W., and Barack Obama have ALL admitted to smoking marijuana. Obama claims he smoked it “frequently”. And then there is the GREATEST Olympian of all times who is a pot smoker. So go give your anecdotes to Michael Phelps, or our last 3 presidents. Because I have already shot these anecdotes down with modern science.
Peace!
“As far as the data in my last post, it all came from the same place Slu2’s information came from. The internet, and we all know, that if you read it on the internet it’s the truth.”
A lot of my data, in fact most that I posted here doesn’t come from the internet, it is reported on the internet. It so happens that many of these references (2 of them) came from one of the most respected universities in the world… Harvard..
Your anecdotes are for the most part non-scientific at best, and anti-scientific at worst untwisted.
“No, you misunderstood that I am for taxation. I am not. Certainly not on plants you can grow and process from your own garden. Processed joints akin to a pack of cigarettes at the local pharmacy? Yeah tax the hell out of ‘em.”
Im with Meso! Same at tobacco. Anyone can grow tobacco, but I have never known anyone who does. Tobacco is primarily bought in any grocery or convenient store, and right now the tax is almost as much as the product.. That’s pretty good money in tax revenue, and yet people still aren’t growing tobacco to save a buck, are they.
So lets legalize it, and tax the hell out of it!
Marcus: “His point was that weed isn’t completely harmless,”
I say: Neither is food, neither is water. The difference is that you CAN die from too much food, and you can die from too much water. You can’t die from too much pot, unless someone accidentally drops a ton of marijuana bricks on your head or something.
So with the idea that “it should be illegal because it’s not completely harmless”.. Should be applied to everything then. Rediculas!
For dispelling the myths and fake anecdotes of marijuana look up John P. Morgan. A true expert, and a scientific assessment of marijuana.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KLy150NR_U
He’s dead now, but he taught medicine for many years.
Here is my YouTube for today, TAX DAY!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gpknxe8-xo
slu2 – It seems to me that you have too much time on your hands.
I agree. Slu2, you seem very dedicated to your cause, but I do hope that you are putting more of your energy into avenues that will reach more people than this forum does.
I had a pretty amazing day.
Instead of writing a bunch, Im just going to post the video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMG6xJT1MbY
I will say that I had way more supporters than detractors today!
Alice, since you mentioned it. Yes! We use a lot of different avenues. I have quite an amazing team actually. xCannabis has goto people in WA, TX, CA, MA, and OR. I have just appointed two editors at xCannabis.com too.
We have dozens of venues this year. We will be doing several of the HempFest events. Seattle is the main one. Last year there were 100,000 people there. This year there will be more. Last year HempFest Seattle took up 6 city blocks in downtown Seattle. This year they expanded to 2 addtional city blocks!
We will have a booth there this year.
See http://www.hempfest.org for more information.
We are also going to do HempFest Idaho on the 18th too. Which obviously will be much smaller, but it has a pretty awesome turnout for Idaho. That’s in Moscow.
We are also all over the web:
http://youtube.com/xcannabiscom
http://twitter.com/xcannabis
http://myspace.com/xcannabis
http://dailymotion.com/xcannabis
http://apps.facebook.com/causes/125809?m=96aaaf39
http://causes.com/xcannabis
And a number of other online venues.
Here is the information for HempFest Idaho
http://xcannabis.com/2009/03/going-to-hempfest-in-idaho/
IdahoFallsToday is where I post least.
slu2 – Didn’t mean to come off wrong in my comment yesterday. Alice said what I was going for pretty much.
Glad it went well for you!
Thanks Marcus, no worries.
BTW sorry if I am ignorant here, is this your site Marcus? If so, good work! I heard an ad on the radio a few days ago. Cool beans!
Nope, not mine…if I was running it, nobody would ever post! LOL
As far as I know, Joe Eagle foots the bill for this place and keeps it going.
Joe doesn’t want to approve of my latest blog. =(
We celebrated the 4/20 Holiday and protested in Idaho Falls.
You can read about it at my blog: (comment edited by Moderator. Please refrain from anymore advertising of your blog. Your site link is readily available via previous comments within this post. Thank you)
I filmed this protest too, it was better than the last protest!
It’s one thing to post your opinions on this topic but lets not turn this site into a pro marijuana blog. It seems like that’s what you’re trying to do here slu. You have your own blog to promote your wacky weed and your views towards it. I’m amazed Joe has let you advertise your site here as much as you have. You’ve posted a link to it more than a half a dozen times and that’s not including all of your videos. Give it a rest man.
I agree w/Jack. I think this site has given your blog enough free advertising.
I am totally fine if Joe doesn’t want me here. But when have you people become the link police here? Seriously?
I am protesting all of the time, and I am releasing media alerts daily. I have been published in main stream media sources, multiple times in the last month, in the same papers.
The few links that I have here is nothing. Yes, I am heading a very active campaign. But I have given Joe Eagle’s site as many links on 3 of my websites.
If you are implying Im spaming, that is not the case. I am working towards releasing freedom to many, and it takes a lot of activity.
The Idaho State Journal have linked to me more than IdahoFallsToday.
You may not like the topic. But you are REALLY annoying when you try to be link police!
Just curious, how many of you were hall-monitors in elementary school? Please raise your hands..
j/k
Teacher, SLU2 posted a link to the marijuana episode of Family Guy!
http://www.dailymotion.com/related/x927d5/video/x91d9l_family-guy-420_shortfilms?hmz=74616272656c61746564
I’m all for your cause, but you’re not helping your cause by acting childish.
Ditto.
Which is my point about you people being the “link police”.. I wrote this to “Guest_Moderator” about the topic.
“@Guest_Moderator, I can tell you that I haven’t repeated the same statistics more than once. That is the honest truth, and out of dozens and dozens of posts, I have posted a link to my site 3 or 4 times. But I have also particpated in 3 or 4 protests since I have arrived at this site. That is not un-called for, not even by the Idaho State Journal standards. If you want to see ad-homenin and regurgitated information, check out the tea party topics… At very least, my information has been requested by other members to defend my position, my protests are fresh, and getting press, and I am truly confused whether you just do not want the content of my topics here, or if you (and the link police) are truly offended by the couple of links that I have posted????”
BTW- My link to the Family Guy episode, was an animated however, realistic view of the USA’s situation with marijuana laws. The cut about the “link police” was my best to vent about how childish some of you people are acting about my posting links to current events in this matter.
Peace!
Ok, and I will make a correction. Out of 88 posts in this thread, I have 7 TOTAL links to my website. 4 of those links are in one post alone though. There is only 3 different posts to CURRENT EVENTS that link to my website.
Like I said, if we count the two protests that I will be attending today. 1 @ the Federal Court building in SLC, and one at 4th District court in Provo Utah, I have been to as many protests as I have posts with links leading to my site since I arrived at this message board.
4 protests, and 3 posts with links to my site in them??? I’d say thats a great ratio.
And I have made dozens of posts, and again, only 3 of those posts have links to my site. (WITH CURRENT INFORMATION, not redundant stuff).
So if you want to politically exclude me, then I have no reason to be here anyway.
May you be blessed. Thanks for hearing me out.
I got looking at the rest of this site. Looks like the marijuana topic is the hottest topic that this site has seen in awhile. I think it would be a dis-service to this site to continues to poltically exclude me, and to not post current events on this topic.
Newspapers have went out of business for not reporting the news that comes in. I wonder if that will prove true for internet blogs such as this one?!
Take care!
There’s quite a big difference between blogs and newspapers — distribution doesn’t factor into the cost to maintain the blog, for one. I also wouldn’t categorize a blog as a business in all cases. Yes, a highly trafficked blog can bring revenue in for sure, but in most cases that revenue alone won’t be enough to pay your bills.
Personally, I think it’s one of the current hot topics because we’ve got a dedicated writer that continually updates and comments on the article, which spurs response. A lot of the visitors to this site just read and move on, a small chunk of us actively post, and a moderate amount will throw their opinion in occasionally. We don’t really have a core group of writers to add and update content…if we did, you’d see a lot more discussion on this site as a whole.
You’re right, there is a difference between a blog and a newspaper. I have worked for a newspaper, and I own 3 blogs.
I did notice that this site is being advertised on the radio, and is trying to sell ads..
I was just making an observation. I think if this is going to be a community source of information, then topics like the 4/20 marijuana protest, which did receive television and newspaper press, ought to be included here, for the sake of being for the community and about the community.
Also about the topic getting a dedicated poster like myself. Ya know, the #1 topic at Obama’s virtual townhall meeting that he had a few weeks ago, and the one that he had a few weeks before that at whitehouse.gov… Was marijuana.
Marijuana is a mainstream issue, not an extreme issue.
There are more habitual marijuana smokers out there then there are Mormons, gays, and blacks… Thats a fact.
Opps, correction:
“There are more habitual marijuana smokers out there then there are Mormons, gays, and blacks… Thats a fact.”
I should have said, “In the USA”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuqvcMDqMn8&feature=related
Obama doesn’t admit it out right. But marijuana was the #1 question duing this townhall meeting.
And according to this CNBC poll, a huge number of Americans (who voted) are in favor of legalization, over 96%..
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28621704
How did we get on the topic of whether it’s a mainstream issue or not? I must have missed it.
Also – Why the constant mention of Obama? Sure, he’s the president, and he’s influential, but I really don’t think he gives a damn about tax revenue that doesn’t come from large corporations or taxes based on income level. I don’t think he’s the ticket to legalization of the use of marijuana from the standpoint of governmental income by taxation.
Knowing Obama smoked sure makes me wanna be a pothead.
Some of these comments are pretty comical. Not to take away from Slu’s cause but some of these so called “statistics” are quite amusing.
Ah well….I’ll stick to my coffee habit.
Just when I thought we had seen the last of CR67 and his inane remarks…up he pops again.
Don’t make me take off your lettuce and tomato and replace them with pepper jack and a 1/2 lb burger patty BLT. Don’t pick on my stud-muffin CR!
Like a bad rash….
And here I thought this was over with.
In the final analysis it’s a lot easier to run a website, three blogs, a few protests, and harass the people on this blog than it is to get off your hump and do the real work that it takes to get marijuana legislation passed.
That legislation will never be passed by the legislature in Idaho, so you can protest til you’re blue in the face and it isn’t going to do you any good.
What you’re trying to do, it’s not a little job. You’re never going to see attendance at your pot protests like they had at civil rights protests, or anti war protests, and I think that’s what you’re mistakenly looking for.
The only way you’ll ever change marijuana law here is via a state wide initiative at the ballot box. You should contact people who have experience in the grass roots work of getting potentially unpopular initiatives placed on the state ballot. Get the pros who helped in other states to give you some direction when it comes to putting this issue in front of the people on voting day. Take it out of the hands of the legislators that don’t care about your little protests.
Learn about the final date for initiative application, the number of signatures needed on petitions, how many signatures need to be gathered from each part of the state for the application to be accepted, and the final date to submit your petitions by.
You have to collect donations for materials and advertisements, get volunteers to collect petition signings, advertise in as many ways as you can afford, and be prepared to account for all the money that was donated to your cause.
The businessman that hits the bong every night isn’t going to carry a picket sign with a pot leaf on it, but he will vote yes in the privacy of the voting booth.
I have spoken.
And now for something totally random, it’s what I do.
Just a curious question.
There seems to be, for lack of a better term, an “unspoken etiquette” that keeps most people from wandering about during the day, in public, visibly drunk. (yes, there are laws too, but, well, you know… )
My question is, if legalized, will this “etiquette” be observed by pot smokers as well?
For the record, I’m for the legalization because I see more pros than cons, I’m just curious what other people may have noticed regarding my random musings
Now Alice, you must not have been reading this column very closely. If you had you would have already known that the question of etiquette isn’t even necessary because, other than me, every other admitted pot smoker on this blog has reported that they never smoke enough to catch more than a light buzz.
The way they put it you’d think they would be capable of driving, mowing the lawn and walking a high wire when they were stoned.
Hee hee
I could share lots of stories about a lot of people, but that’s filed away in my “stupid stuff that no one needs to know about” file. Thankfully, none of the stories involve a lawn mower
Yea, I’ve been reading, and I have to say that a pot smoker saying they NEVER smoke enough to get more than a light buzz is right up there with a casual drinker saying they never drink enough to not drive.
It’s a thin, thin line.
Untwisted,
It seems that you are equating the high from pot to alcohol inebriation. They are two distinctly different realms of mind alterations. Alcohol tends to anesthetize the spatial reasoning side of the brain before doing likewise to the rest of the brain. That’s why you can still talk a good story about your prowess in bed to a potential mate, but fail to live up to your claims. Marijuana has the opposite effect. You may not be nearly as charming to a potential mate and you may even forget her name, but unless you’ve smoked yourself into complete oblivion, you should have no problem completing the task at hand.
I knew two guys who won the Utah state doubles racquetball championship, stoned. That’s how they trained…stoned. I’ve experienced the same thing on a pair of skis. If anything, pot (in the right amount), tends to “free up” the spatial reasoning side of the brain from the cognative side, thus allowing a more natural expression of physical prowess.
I remember some studies done at the University of North Carolina and at UCLA years ago that can substantiate these claims. I’ll try to dig them up.
Meso, four words:
Your kind is rare.
In exasperation I must say, Meso, your last argument is one of the very reasons I quit smoking dope over 25 years ago. I really did believe it back then. Pot freed you up and allowed you to excel physically, and cocaine gave you an edge in the business world.
Bunk.
I’m staying anonymous here as this isn’t a topic that I care to share with family, friends & co-workers. Working in a professional environment, this isn’t the type of thing you want your employer knowing about. Which is why Slu and his band of merry stoners were only a dozen strong during their protests. Another reason I haven’t posted sooner is there’s no arguing with a stoner, whether they be a past or present toker. Everyone who’s partaken of the herb on a regular basis has their own views and experiences and each stoner will always think they’ve tried the best and have the most knowledge regarding this topic. I’m no different. I’ve tried it all from mexican dirt weed to kine to the finest hydroponic available so I have my stories and experiences as well. I have to side more with Meso on this topic though. Different types of bud will give you different types of highs. Some bud will enhance ones sexual prowess. I smoked some that made me concentrate more on my studies while in school. And I’ve smoked some that made me perform better in sports, as well as helped me relax after a hard workout at the gym. And then of course you have the stuff that makes you want to just melt into your couch and consume large quantities of junk food.
As much as I smoked over the years, I was never able to smoke 4-5 joints a day and function, no matter what type of weed it was.
In regards to the strength issue and whether or not pot is stronger today than 20 or 30 years ago, I have to say that it is. The level of THC is much stronger than back when your daddy and grandaddy were smoking it. Thats not saying all weed is stronger, certainly not your average mexican regs, but certain strains have much higher levels of THC than back in the day.
As for legalizing it, I’m all for it. I haven’t smoked it in years, but I do think it’s a waste of time to arrest people for it, crowd our prisons over it and classify it as a schedule II narcotic. Especially when alcohol is much more dangerous.
I believe Untwisted said it perfectly in comment #98. I’ve known people from all walks of life and all professions that have consumed this herb, but you won’t find them standing in front of city hall or on the street corner picketing its legalization because they have too much to loose. They will vote for it in the privacy of their own voting booth though.
So to Slu2 & the others out there picketing with their pot leaf t-shirts and long hair, you’re wasting your time. Do as Untwisted suggested and get petitions signed and start writing your congressman and state senators. That’s the only way you’ll change things.
Good luck
As for physical responsiveness. One name Michael Phelps, says enough to me. The greatest Olympian of all times…… Stoner..
As for mental agility.. How about the last 3 presidents of the USA? But maybe that doesn’t take much…
Anyway. The only time I have witnessed pot ruining someone’s life, is when they get caught by the police.
As for driving statistics or harm while stoned. According to a recent national study, 17 people died last in year car accidents who tested positive for marijuana. Which as I have said before, is kind of amazing seeing that out of all illicit or legal drugs, marijuana metabolites stay in your system the longest, even if you are not stoned.
I guess everything that I just said, I have said before. But of course, all of the questions and statements that I am responding to here have been asked or stated before…
What it comes down to, is it doesn’t take Einstein to do the math here. Pot is good. I can elaborate more, even though this too is redundant.
-Pot is good for medicine.
-Pot is safe(r) [than alcohol, caffeine, chocolate, tobacco, and other illicit drugs) for recreation.
-Legalizing pot would be amazing for our economy, both in relieving the burden that prohibition puts on out treasury, but also in tax revenue for those too lazy to grow it (similar to tobacco, where it can be grown, but most people don’t).
@untwisted. Raising awareness and providing education is like tilling the ground in a farm. There is preliminary work that needs to be done, before wasting time on a Bill or Initiative. We could toss in some issues to vote on, but if people are so ignorant about pot to think it causes retardation or something.. Well, it would be a waste of time to put something on the ballot that people are so ignorant about. (reefer madness)
I will continue to protest, raise awareness, provide education. Someday, when the time is right, we will propose some changes to the laws via the ballot.
@anonymous, I write my politicians all of the time. I have written every representative/senator in Idaho, and I got two responses thus far.
See here: (sorry, another link!! OMG)
And the responses that I got, are the exact reason why more awareness needs to be raised to this issue, so that vague or idiotic responses from these politicians will cost them their job next election hopefully!
If stoners unite, and vote, we can get some of these stubborn geezers out of office, and get some more culturally aware young people in, in their places.
I had a long, hot day of protesting today. Got haranged by a cop, got a lot of film, and found a lot of supporters today! It was a pretty amazing day! I will have video posted Sunday night.
Give me a break, Micheal Phelps isn’t and wasn’t a stoner. He went to a party and smoked a bowl and someone took a picture of it, that doesn’t make him a stoner. You can’t train and compete at the level he’s at and be a stoner too.
@Applejack, Phelps was hitting that bong like a pro bud! I think you are in denial about Phelps. No matter, I can name dozens of other pothead top athletes. Recently in the news as well:
Nick Diaz, MMA fighter:
http://stash.norml.org/mma-fighter-nick-diaz-says-smoking-marijuana-is-part-of-his-plan/
Jet’s Shaun Ellis:
http://stash.norml.org/jets-de-ellis-charged-with-marijuana-possession/
And dozens and dozens of other very competitive athletes regularly use marijuana. Some, like Nick Diaz use marijuana as part of their sports training plan.
Check out http://www.celebstoner.com for more examples.
Also, I am just mentioning athlete stoners that will ADMIT it or, who have been arrested for it. There are 1000’s of top athletes that no one knows about, who do not admit it, because they do not want to lose their xMillion contracts!
So we have the last 3 presidents, Obama who admitted to “inhaling frequently, that was the point”.. Bush who tried to hide the issue, but still was known as a major partier, and who was arrested for it. And Clinton, who although said he didn’t inhale, surely did.. As Obama said “That was the point”..
We know of dozens and dozens of top athletes.
So many other celebs smoke it openly too. Micheal Phelps is a drop in the bucket.
If pot is so devastating to people’s performance… Well… I say BS!!!!
And if pot is a gateway drug, it appears it’s the gateway to becoming president of the USA!
You see one picture in the news and you think he’s a pro? Like Guest said in comment 105, there’s no arguing with a stoner so I won’t bother. You can’t stand it when somebody doesn’t believe everything you say or has an opinion that differs from yours. You’re showing your true age Slu. Don’t feel bad though, I was the same way when I was your age, I thought I knew everything too. You’ve got a lot to learn little buddy.
And I find it real amusing that you keep bringing up Obama and other Presidents. Just because somebody has smoked it in the past, like Obama admitted to, doesn’t make him a stoner. What you don’t realize is we all grow up and move on with our lives. Maybe you will someday too.
I think slu is a passionate young man who merely wants to be able to smoke his dope legally. The previous poster made a valid point.. A lot of us smoked it when we were younger but then we grew up and got real jobs, some of us got married, had children and became responsible citizens of our community. And some took the other path and did just enough to get by in life, not making much of themselves and were content with that as long as they could still smoke their dope. I’m sure their are successful potheads out there and Slu says he has a wife and children, but I don’t think you can be a responsible parent and smoke dope too. Maybe I’m just old fashioned in my beliefs.
“there’s no arguing with a stoner so I won’t bother.”
@AppleJack: Are you getting me, if your comments aren’t arguments.. Well.. LOL, I’ll just move on…
“You’re showing your true age Slu.”
@AppleJack: So are you, it’s seems like you are senile.
“You can’t stand it when somebody doesn’t believe everything you say or has an opinion that differs from yours.”
@AppleJack: You doubted my claims, and I proved them. It’s not me who can’t stand that someone doesn’t agree with me. And it’s not me that you need to agree with, it’s either you believe the facts, or you don’t. I have given plenty of references for your review. Take it or leave it.
“You see one picture in the news and you think he’s a pro?”
@AppleJack: Who Michael Phelps, Nick Diaz, or Shaun Ellis? Which one of these is not a pro??
LOL
“Just because somebody has smoked it in the past, like Obama admitted to, doesn’t make him a stoner.”
@AppleJack: More arguing? I just read your pledge not to argue, and then another argumentative post from you. You’re hopeless.
Ok, about Obama. When someone answers a question “Did you smoke pot, did you inhale”. and Obama says “I inhaled frequent, uh.. That was the point”. That makes him a stoner at one time in his life. And if being a stoner in your youth, leads you to being president of the USA, like the 2 presidents before you.. Well, this whole idea of how pot makes you stupid, is. Well… STUPID!
Are you going to continue to argue AppleJack?
@Candice:
“I’m sure their are successful potheads out there and Slu says he has a wife and children, but I don’t think you can be a responsible parent and smoke dope too”
You say that, but you give no reasons why. Unless it’s because as you say “maybe your just old fashioned”.
My parents didn’t party, yet I spend 100’s of hours per year more time with my kids than my parents ever did.
My parents worked hard, and made good money. I don’t work nearly as much as they did, and yet my wife doesn’t have to work, she is a stay at home mom, and I make twice as much as my parents did, even considering their wage in the not-so-distance past.
My parents used force sometimes, and were very strict. I have never hit my kids, never talked to them condescendingly, never beat my wife, etc…
So if marijuana is so bad for parenting. WHY?!
“I think slu is a passionate young man who merely wants to be able to smoke his dope legally. ”
Yes. I do not want to be a criminal. And I do not want to see stupid laws, that try to prohibit a harmless plant make me such.
I have seen so many people’s lives ruined by the drug war. Not because they used pot. But because they got caught using pot.
Tell me how many potheads that you know who kick their dogs, beat their wives or children, get in car accidents…..
Pot mellows people out. Takes the edge off, without aweful side effects like tobacco and alcohol cause…
Marijuana is not just a mild ‘drug’, it is a harmless, natural herb that is not refined, processed, or added to. It comes from the ground the way that God intended, and it doesn’t kill anyone.
If my kids were in highschool, and they were going to party no matter what I say (like most kids do). Out of all recreational drugs, including alcohol. I would MUCH rather see them use the safest recreational drug known to man. Marijuana! And I would hate to see them have their lives ruined because of this inane ‘war on drugs’..
I realize you are “old fashion”. But that doesn’t count for much when it comes to reality, science, and 4000 years of proven history.
I think you need to review previous comments 85 & 86 slu. You say you dont want to be a criminal but you are being a criminal by smoking dope and that in turn is being an irresponsible parent. I’m sure you’ll go off on 3 or 4 more tangents and explain why your different. Don’t bother though because like AppleJack I really don’t care to argue with you either. Everybody has given their opinion on this issue and even if they’ve semi-agreed with you you’ve found a way to discredit them or talk down to them. Your an immature kid slu and you’ve got a lot to learn about life. The laws may be stupid to you but their laws nonetheless and you’re not above them.
Does everyone believe everything they read on the internet?
This article gets more and more like this poster with every comment: http://tornandfrayed.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341e1c7853ef010536b9c0b3970c-800wi
“I think you need to review previous comments 85 & 86 slu. You say you dont want to be a criminal but you are being a criminal by smoking dope and that in turn is being an irresponsible parent.”
I moved here from WA, where I smoked marijuana legally. I have lived in Idaho less than two months. If you watch my recent video that I made on hydroponic growing, I speak about how I do not buy pot anymore. I haven’t bought pot in months.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VY8rZk-csQ&feature=channel_page
But like the founding fathers, I believe a little civil disobedience can go a long way for changing STUPID, INANE, and DESTRUCTIVE laws.
Thanks for the assumptions!
BTW- Candice, I know that you say you are done here. However, you never had the courtesy to answer my questions, despite the fact that I fully and completely responded to you, even though your statements had no other point that to shame me.
Marcus, I can some up all of these emotional, and insulting attacks to me from some of the posters here: “troll”
“An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.”
Instead of having a conversation, 3 of the last responders to me make a lot of insults, and challenges. Yet when I respond, I only get more insults. That’s the definition of an internet troll.
I have been very accommodating and I will continue to be so. But what is childish, is when some of you people offer NOTHING to the conversation but insults.
“Does everyone believe everything they read on the internet?”
Some believe knowledge can ONLY be attained by spending a fortune on college. Which is why most of my reference come from professors. Notice in post on, I use the advice of a Harvard economics professor. And throughout the conversation, I have given many other credible references.
But who cares about Harvard! Knowledge is only useful when it negates the benefits of marijuana, right?! LOL
Here is another very credible professor on drug policy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNS6U6oVBjk
As for any trolls who have nothing but insults. John P. Morgan blows your insults, un-factual claims out of the water!
He was a professor of pharmacology for 26 years.
Here are more experts on the subject. These people are former police officers, including the former police chief of Seattle. There are over 500 members of L.E.A.P (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH8OW7mw8IM
Oh wait, this all was found on the internet. THROW IT OUT!!
If that’s your philosophy, you’re hopeless.
BTW- Not all of the officers in LEAP are former.
Here is another interview that was found on the internet. (OMG Not the internet!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6UpqmGC2dM
Joe, I realize that this is the hottest topic on the blog at this moment but I think it’s degrading the quality of the other information we cover here. I know I’m not the only regular reader and contributor who has this feeling. Please consider removing this topic in it’s entirety.
Anyone else who’s in agreement with me, please follow this post up with a request that Joe remove this topic.
In case my message was lost in the middle of too many words…
PLEASE REMOVE THIS TOPIC FROM IFT
I agree with you Untwisted. It seems like the traffic and general discussions have dramatically decreased since this issue has come up. (at least close it for additional comments. I think the author has covered everything and the follow up comments are pointless)
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t find anything wrong with the topic per se’, (even though I could care less one way or the other if pot is legalized) but Slu feels the need to come on everyday and bring it back to the forefront making it the only topic discussed.
Don’t take this the wrong way Slu, but it would be nice if you joined us in discussing the other issues we have posted. Just a thought.
I think that fight to censor this topic has been the most degrading part of this topic.
1. First it was “LINKS!!!!!!”…. After that issue was settled, and the link issue became a non-issue…
2. Then it was “You are irresponsible!!!”..
3. After that it was a barrage of un-constructive insults towards me.
4. Now it’s “it’s ruining the site”..
What’s next??
You people have tried SOOOOO desperately to censor this topic. If it’s not one reason, it’s another. So why? Why can’t we talk about this in a civilized way without the personal or baseless attacks?!
This site hasn’t decreased in traffic. I look at the other topics going on here, and most of them just aren’t that interesting. There is the European topic, it’s getting a lot of traffic. This topic is getting a lot of traffic, and there is a few comments here and there are the less interesting topics. But if anything, compared to 2 months ago, this website is actually getting MORE traffic than before! I look at what was going on before I arrived, and it’s not a whole lot different than what was happening before I got here.
Besides, this topic is buried already!
Here is something that tells me that this topic should stay. At the top of this website there is this motto:
“FINALLY! You can speak your mind and be heard! Read by thousands every month!”
So is it “FINALLY, You can speak your mind and be heard! As long as it isn’t about marijuana”?!
Some of you have a real issue with free speech, and have tried EVERYTHING to censor me.
I realize we are all “behind the zion curtain” here. But that doesn’t mean that oppression is OK.
Get a life, and move on. If you don’t like this topic, don’t post on it!
Here is something else to consider about this site, before you consider censorship of someone who you don’t agree with read the very bottom of this site:
Disclaimer: Articles are written by individuals expressing their own viewpoints and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or perspectives of other IdahoFallz.com writers or administrators. Please communicate your agreement or disagreement directly with relevant authors via the comment box, or register as a writer and post alternative stories.
Some of you just need to learn to play nice with others.
I haven’t bothered with this topic because it doesn’t interest me, but I’m beginning to side with the others. I don’t think you understand what people are saying Slu. Nobody wants to censor you, this site is all about free speech. But it appears that you’ve taken over this community website and turned it into your own personal marijuana spambot. Who wants to hear about marijuana every single day? Your using this site to push you pot message down everyones throat because you know that there’s a lot more traffic here than what you get on your site and you can reach a larger audience. Like Untwisted said in the chatbox, it’s become hyper-redundant. If you don’t know what that means, look it up. It seems like we can’t come onto this site anymore without you shoving more statistics, links and videos into our face every single day since you’ve joined. We get your point. We understand what you want. That’s great that you love you pot. That’s your perogative and nobody here is trying to take that away from you. Just take a break for a couple of days.. We’ve got tons of other topics to talk about, why not do what others have suggested and expand your mind a bit & talk about something other than pot for just one day?
“but Slu feels the need to come on everyday and bring it back to the forefront making it the only topic discussed.”
This particular topic is buried, but here is the key. If you want the topic to die, don’t try to censor it. Don’t post on it. Pretend like it doesn’t even exist.
Censorship is not the key to having peace with this topic. If you don’t like it, move on.
As for me talking only about this topic. I will eventually settle down, and have more time for other topics. But right now, I am on a protest tour, protesting this topic in many different cities ‘behind the zion curtain’..
Today I am in Salt Lake City staying at a hotel while I am protesting marijuana.
I announced on my website last week, that I will not have a lot of time for these protests in the near future. I will be focusing on other things because my life is accelerating in a new direction right now (new baby, new home, new state, new new new new)… So I have to lock down, and focus on other things.
I do have a topic that I am going to post tonight about infant potty training. I hope it gets posted, it is a really cool topic.
Anyway, thanks for who all has sincerely participated here. And for those who have censored me (yes, some of my links are missing), and for those who want to censor me or argue with me. GET A LIFE! MOVE ON!
BTW- ConcernedGuest, I just noticed that you responded to me, inbetween my posts.
Thanks for your suggestions. And I will give you one of my own.
This Tax Day protest doesn’t even show up on the homepage anymore. You don’t HAVE to come here and read about this. You don’t have to click the link and read the comments on this topic. And you certainly don’t have to respond or take issue with me or my topics. You make this choice. You click the link, you read the comments, and you respond. None of this is anything that I am forcing you to do. As I have suggested many times here. Instead of calling for censorship, instead of asking for my posts to be removed (yes, that’s censorship). Instead of making insults, or disparaging remarks about my parenting, etc…
Move on. Don’t click on this topic. Don’t read the replies. Don’t respond. Let this topic die if that’s what you want.
But it is up to you to either respond, or not respond.
I’ve posted two topics. 1 about a Tax Day Protest, that got a lot of other press (not just on this site). And then I posted about the 4/20 holiday (something else that got mainstream news too). Im not posting topic after topic. I have posted two topics here, because both of these topics are relevant to the community (or else they wouldn’t be getting news elsewhere).
Yes I have came back several times to respond to people. But they made the decision to either ask me a question, or chide me. I don’t mind responding to people. But don’t make it sound like I am cramming anything down your throats.
As for the other topics. For example the most recent topic “Are you a Republican, Democrat, or Redneck”.
Sorry, but topic like that are so narrow minded, and dis concerning to me that I don’t have time for it.
People are stuck in a two party system, and are so occupied with it that it consumes them.
Im not worried about political parties. Im worried about issues. And right now, marijuana is the #1 issue in America. Like I stated earlier, twice on WhiteHouse.gov Obama has had “Virtual Town Hall Meetings”. And both times Marijuana law reform was the #1 topic.
So this isn’t just me. This is also the rest of the USA too!
I posted a topic tonight about infant potty training. And it is a really interesting topic. Most people can’t believe our children get potty trained by the time they are 6 months old.
So I demonstrated how real this is in my latest topic tonight.
It has to be approved by the management, and I think it will be approved, at least I hope so.
Maybe you will join me there too! But remember, I’m not forcing you to. You are invited to join. But it’s your choice.
I found a topic on this message board from April 13th 2008 (about the same time I posted my topic this year) about marijuana law reform. If you really WANT to talk about this topic, and don’t like what I have to say.
Check out this: http://www.idahofallstoday.com/2008/04/13/three-steps-to-end-our-war-on-drugs/comment-page-2/
I also got thinking this morning about how people feel like I have forced them to respond, or forced them to click the link to this topic. Or I have some how bent their free will.
Take for example the series Marijuana Inc, that has been on CNBC lately.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28281668/
It comes on regularly, some people like it, some people don’t. But those who don’t like it can change the station. Those who do can watch it. (or not)
But it is a choice. Just like on IdahoFallsToday.
If you don’t like my topic, click on Marcus’s topic. Your free will is still yours. If you aren’t interested in any of the topics that are being discussed here. MAKE YOUR OWN!
But don’t blame me for your inability to come up with new material. Or don’t blame me because you sought out my topic, and responded. These are all choiced. You either make one choice or another. But I haven’t forced you to do anything.
We live in such a “victim society”. Don’t play the victim, and please don’t try to victimize someone else, because you feel like a victim. Censorship is not cool.
Sorry to burst your bubble their slu, but our economy is the number one topic in America. I haven’t seen anything in the local or national news about pot being the number one topic. There was a small blurb in the local news about the half a dozen people protesting in Idaho Falls on April 20th. I would hardly call that the number one topic in the country.
nice try though.
You didn’t burst my bubble. Im just surprised how many people live their lives based exclusively on assumptions.
First you assumed that I was breaking the law. I proved you wrong there.
Second you assumed that Marijuana is not America’s number #1 issue.
Let me burst your bubble:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkrQDh8FBVw
That’s right, both of Obama’s “Virtual Town Hall Meetings” resulted in Marijuana being the #1 issue.
Why? You say that the economy is the number 1 issue. Well yes, and legalizing marijuana would fix our economy.
(reference the link that I posted to the Harvard economist in post #1)
Or read his book:
http://www.amazon.com/Drug-War-Crimes-Consequences-Prohibition/dp/0945999909/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1237063158&sr=1-1
Here is another national poll about it from CNN. (A CNBC poll resulted in the same result)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLZ5mXroW_E&feature=related
Sorry Slu but marijuana alone is not going to fix our economy. Are you that naive? Legalizing marijuana is not going to put millions of people back to work, it’s not going to fix the stock market and the banking system, it’s not going to provide jobs for the millions of people who have been laid off over the past year and half. You’re just doing a search of marijuana on youtube and using all those videos as your answer to everything and that’s not going to happen.
Marijuana isn’t going to keep GM from going bankrupt, it’s not going to give back all those people laid off from IBM, Micron, Catapillar and thousands of other large buisinesses work again. Start using your head slu and stop believing everything you read and hear on the internet.
Here’s an except from one of your links.
Field of Green
Northern California’s Mendocino County. A picture postcard of the far west and the site of a controversial, profitable and increasingly violent criminal enterprise… the marijuana trade.
Note the last 7 words of that paragraph. I can’t help but wonder why you haven’t talked about that? That being an increasingly violent criminal enterprise.
Here’s an excerpt from the same link.
The Smuggler
Bruce Perlowin, a “nice Jewish boy” from Florida turned “Marijuana Kingpin,” ran one of the biggest drug smuggling operations of all time. He smuggled almost a billion dollars of pot right under San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge.
Why is it you’re not talking about all the illegal smuggling that’s going on?
I find it interesting the way you pick and choose the propoganda you’re spreading on this site. Why aren’t you talking about the downside of the dope business? Why aren’t you discussing the children that are being affected by this drug? You know the ones I speak of. The ones that have to live with dope dealing parents and parents that are high all the time and risk being busted by the Feds and getting put in foster care because their parents got thrown in jail.
You keep talking about how it’s legal in California and it’s legal in Washington State, but why aren’t you talking about how its’t still against the law on a Federal level and that the Feds are busting people left and right every day. You don’t talk about the downside to all these busts and what happen to all these children that get caught in the middle.
But I’m almost positive you’ll give us four or five more posts explaining why you’re not discussing these issues.
You’re opinion is noted, and I have given it thought
However Candice, I will take the advise of an educated professional such as a Harvard economist.
Marijuana is America’s number 1 cash crop. If it were legalized, it would put 77 Billion + into our economy, and create MILLIONS of legitmate, and taxed jobs.
If you can’t see this, it’s not my fault.
And my research on this hasn’t came from the internet. Sure the data can be found on the internet, but the data’s source is from top professors, economists, law makers, and researchers in this country. I’ll take your OPINION for what it’s worth. But compared to the science on this issue, your opinion doesn’t mean much.
“That being an increasingly violent criminal enterprise. ”
Because like in the 20’s and 30’s with alcohol prohibition, the trade is given to the cartels and black market dealers.
In a taxed and regulated market, the black market goes away, and the mafia’s disappear.
This has all been done before Candice. Historically, prohibition is what creates the violence.
You say: “I can’t help but wonder why you haven’t talked about that?”
Candice, you are ASSUMING again. Just because you didn’t pay attention, doesn’t mean that I haven’t discussed it. Read my posts about L.E.A.P (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition).
What the interview with Seattle’s former police cheif.
The violence is created by prohibition.
Didn’t you see this link earlier?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH8OW7mw8IM
I’ve already covered the black market violence issue.
Without the black market, there is no black market violence.
Don’t you remember learning about prohibition of alcohol when you were in school?
Since Slu2 has posted 11 out of the last 16 posts in an apparent attempt to bury my request for Joe to put an end to this travesty, I’ll repeat my request. The last I heard this isn’t a pro marijuana website! It’s named Idaho Falls Today and this topic isn’t a driving force in our town.
Joe, If you out there listening, PLEASE remove this topic from the blog.
Other members, unless you really enjoy giving this redundant data a home on the web call out for it’s removal too. The more often Slu’s links are displayed, the higer our Search Engine rankings become when people search for marijuana data, and this isn’t a marijuana blog.
This is our blog NOT slu2’s marijuana blog.
Slu2 is just going to puke out another dozen posts to bury this post now, so com one guys, give me a hand here.
Joe, please remove this topic from our blog.
I apologize Untwisted. I shouldnt have fallen for slus propoganda by replying to his comments. It’s clear that none of our comments & opinions mean anything as he stated in comment 140. Hes not interested in anybodys opinion but his own and hes made that clear by degrading & dismissing everyone on this site that doesnt agree with him. I gave him a perfect example in comment 138 how marijuana will not fix our current economy but he continues to throw out crazy statements from some dope smoking professor. There are hundreds of professors in this country that are idiots, but if someone has never been to college they wouldnt know this.
This will be my last comment to this propoganda campaign. For arguments sake your right and I’m wrong slu, lets leave it at that.
I forget which one of the regulars posted a funny special olympics pic in the past that would be perfect for this post.
Have a nice day everybody.
Does anyone suspect slu2 and the old Crystal could be siblings? Talk about overkill.
“Since Slu2 has posted 11 out of the last 16 posts in an apparent attempt to bury my request ”
Yes, it’s all about you untwisted. It’s a huge conspiracy to escape from your attempt at censorship. Get over yourself.
“Does anyone suspect slu2 and the old Crystal could be siblings?”
Another conspiracy?
I make no attempt to hide who I am. Not by name, not by location, and not by face. In fact, I think Im the only person on this message board that is not hiding my identity.
“Hes not interested in anybodys opinion but his own and hes made that clear by degrading & dismissing everyone on this site that doesnt agree with him.”
The thing here Candice, is that when I don’t agree with you, I provide you facts to define my position, and I use incredibly credible references.
When you don’t agree with me, you attempt to assume things about me. You don’t seem to use a lot of facts, you just say “You are a bad parent because you break the law” (without even knowing which law Im breaking, or if in fact I am breaking it).. Or you say “Why haven’t you addressed the violence issue”, when clearly I have addressed it as I pointed out earlier, and then I readdressed it again..
I am interested in your opinions, and I have obliged you by responded in depth to every statement or accusation that you have made to me. If I wasn’t interested, I would do what you do, and assume things without actually reading what the other person has wrote.
In 3 different instances Candice you have incorrectly assumed things about me, and if you would have read what I had written you wouldn’t have had to assume anything.
I am very transparent. Im not hiding anything.
(thought I would give my 2 cents again here, since the conspiracy theories, and website link police issue is just as much of a problem on this thread, as the other one)
“I think the main thing wrong with this message board right now, is how hard everyone is trying to do Joe Eagles job, and trying to think for him. The link police thing got real old real quick. Now the conspiracy thing. What’s next?
Here is my advice. Take it or leave it.
Let Joe do his job, if he sees a problem. If he sees traffic declining, if he wants to censor me, if he wants to remove my links, if he wants to ban me… Well, he is a big boy. Let him do his job, however he pleases. If there wasn’t so much drama here, I think this board would improve a ton!
You say that all I have posted about is marijuana. Well, that’s what I have been working on for the last couple of months. But I have also posted about infant potty training recently (hopefully it gets posted)..
Someone mentioned youtube links, and how they would negatively effect traffic on this site.
I think if you look at youtube (just look at some of the youtube links I’ve posted here). Marijuana links do ANYTHING but decrease traffic. A few of the links that I have posted in this thread alone have more than 3 million hits on YouTube. I wouldn’t say that is a bad thing.
If you don’t agree with marijuana legalization information, maybe it’s a bad thing. But when has this site only been about 1 point of view?
Marijuana links won’t hurt this site. But drama will! Stop with the drama and silly conspiracy theories. Thanks!”
Now, can we move on to constructive conversation? Again, if you don’t want to talk, or read about marijuana, then —- Don’t come to this thread anymore —— It’s that simple. Im not forcing you to come read this.
And if you have something constructive to say, I would be happy to converse with you about it.
Take care!
I guess no one else had anything constructive to say.
Well, I’ll unofficially announce this thread has come to it’s peak. It was a good chat, thanks everyone! Especially those who had something constructive to say (pro or con).
Peace!
My latest protest in the Zion Curtain.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUgcvTZrXWA
Marcus has asked for the raw numbers on this 77 Billion dollar relief from ending prohibition.
Legalizing, regulating and taxing marijuana has HUGE potential to save our economy, there is no doubt there.
Last year 860,000 people were arrested on simple possession of marijuana (a victimless crime).
Enforcing these laws, building prisons, court houses, hiring clerks, dispatchers, etc.. All costs money. A prisoner costs the system over $35,000 per year, and with millions in prison..
Here is another fact. We have 25% of the world’s prison population. But only 5% of the worlds total population.
Here are some raw number’s from Dr. Jeffery’s Miron’s webiste:
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/mironreport.html
And here is another source, this is a judge from California:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=8BACCD0DA16FE246
This conversation came from the chat box, but I am giving Marcus some data to chew on since he asked.
Here it is from our own Department of Agriculture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne9UF-pFhJY&feature=related
From the chat box:
# Marcus : The complete report that you sent me to states the following in the summary:
# Marcus : $13.9 billion total, $7.7 billion reduced prohibition costs, $6.2 in yearly tax revenue. Straight from his summary.
# Marcus : That’s why I’m wondering if I’m missing something.
Ok, Marcus, I can tell you where the problem that you are having comes from. You are looking at State figures? Most of the drug war is fought on the federal level. Including the border patrol, the violence at the border, and even the Medical Marijuana dispensaries in the 13 medical marijuana states. If you are only looking at state figures you are missing a bunch of the expense. The DEA and the Border patrol are a huge part of it.
For example. California alone is looking to increase their state revenue from taxes alone, a conservative figure is over 1 billion dollars right off the bat, according to that California Judge, Jim Gray. And that’s only state tax revenue. The Feds wouldn’t see anything until they legalize. So the federal taxes will be significant too. Plus the multiple billions that they will save in enforcement.
You are looking at state only savings? Thats a fraction of the expense.
You have to DEA, the border patrol, the Federal prisons, the Federal courts, the Federal judges, the federal marshals and other agents.
It’s not the MMJ states who are busting the medical marijuana dispensaries. It’s the feds that are trumping state law, and using federal resources to do the enforcement.
Check out what Judge Jim Gray says too. And honestly, the 2002 report is reflective of 2002. Since 2002, eforcement has risen, and 100,000’s of thousands people more per year are going to prison for marijuana.
For example in 2007 only (cough cough), 750,000 people were arrested for marijuana. In 2008 860,000 people were arrested for marijuana. In 1 year a rise of 110,000 people.
That trend has been ongoing.
I got my figures from this website: http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/execsummary.html
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/mironreport.html
Yes, they are a few years old, but it’s the only written material that I have been able to find. Care to direct me toward written material that supports $77+ billion dollars? YouTube videos don’t cut it.
Lets just do an experiment.
We have the largest prison population in the world. 25% of the total worlds prison population can be found right now in the USA’s prisons. (even though we only have 5% of the total world’s population).
We have in excess of 2 million people in prison, most of which are in for non-violent drug offenses.
So lets be conversative and say that only 1 million of them are in for drugs.
When we multiply that by the average cost of keeping a prisoner locked up for one year, over $30,000 per year. What is the figure? I’ll pull out my handy dandy drug war cost machine (the windows calculator)..
That’s looking like a conservative 30,000,000,000 (30 BILLION). Just to house these non-violent drug offenders. And the cost per prisoner is closer to $35,000 actually. So my number is convervative.
So if we would save $30,000,000,000 just from not having to house these drug offenders.
Then what about not having to enforce drug laws. What about the savings of not having to build more of these prisons. What about the savings of not having to hire and train, and equip, and pay all of these agents. What about the savings of court expenses…
Then lets get to the taxes. State taxes on marijuana in California, will be multiple billions alone. Thats not including federal revenue.
And we have 50 states…
I think 77 Billion dollars is conservative.
You don’t seem to want to point out all the information on anything. You pick and choose what you want people to know and the fact is, people aren’t going to prison for petty marijuana possesion. The people that are going to prison are those growing it, transporting it, smuggling it and selling it. As well they should because after all, it’s still agaisn’t the law last time I checked.
Even if it’s legalized they won’t do away with DEA, border patrol and whatnot, so you won’t be saving as much money as you think there. They will still be patrolling and out their fighting the war on drugs for cocaine, meth, exctasy, etc.
OMG can we PLEEEEZE get some new topics!
(yes, I know, I’m trying to think of some myself as well… )
Amen
The thing about legalizing marijuana is it will be just like legalizing alcohol.
Once alohol was legalizing the illegal manufacturing and distribution was ended. Legalizing it drives the price down, and regulates the sale of it.
Look at tobacco and the price of it. People are growing it, or selling it in the black market.
When the black market doesn’t exist, the problems that you speak about, doesn’t exist.
Legalizing marijuana will do the same thing for this country that legalizing alcohol did.
Wish I could edit:
The thing about legalizing marijuana is it will be just like legalizing alcohol.
Once alcohol was legalized the illegal manufacturing and distribution was ended. Legalizing it drives the price down, and regulates the sale of it. In turn,it ends the black market.
Look at tobacco and the price of it. People are not growing it, or selling it in the black market.
When the black market doesn’t exist, the problems that you speak about, do not exist.
Legalizing marijuana will do the same thing for this country that legalizing alcohol did.
Marijuana isn’t the problem, it’s the black market that is created by the prohibition.
(Alice, go ahead and start a topic, Im comfortable with this one.)
Wow…Looks like someone hit the bong a little too hard today. You just posted that dude. Settle down.
People keep saying that they want references.
Example: “You don’t seem to want to point out all the information on anything. You pick and choose what you want people to know and the fact is, people aren’t going to prison for petty marijuana possesion”
So far I have given the reference of a respectable, conservative judge:
His website:
http://www.judgejimgray.com/
Youtube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RWfCwl0lZo
I have given a reference from a Harvard economist:
Dr. Jeffery Miron
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
Youtube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GXQ4xSgIuY
I have given a link to Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, which is a group of nearly 1,000 current and former law enforcement agents that voice this data also.
http://www.leap.cc
YouTube Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LayaGk0TMDc
And if your visit MPP, you will see more mynute details on this topic.
http://blog.mpp.org/category/tax-and-regulate/
And if you want the best reasons I’ve ever heard. Look up what Ron Paul says about it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSCd-1IVYY
Now I don’t people (mostly the anonymous) are going to puke up their liver because I posted this information.
But seriously, why don’t you people worry about REAL problems?!
slu2, you’re posting figures, please cite your sources. Math is fine and dandy, but anybody can throw a number out there and multiply it by another number.
Marcus, which numbers did I not give references for?
You mean, how many people are in prisopn, and what it costs to house them?
Here is a graph (which also shows why 2002 data is not as relevant to 2009 data)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_correctional_population_timeline.gif
Here is a worldwide graph:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Incarceration_rates_worldwide.gif
Here is for current numbers and the increase:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_incarceration_timeline-clean.gif
Wiki says this about the costs of incarceration:
“The United States spends an estimated $60 billion each year on corrections.[69] While cost varies from state to state, in 2005, the average cost of incarceration per prisoner in the United states was $23,876. That comes out to $65.41 per day.”
(4 years old)
This is alos information from 4 years ago, from the Department of Justice:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/p05.pdf
More information about “the war on drugs”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_drugs
Anonymouse,
According to F.B.I. statistics 89% of those people arrested for pot violations are arrested for simple possession, not manufacturing or distributing. Look it up!
Simple possesion would be anything under a quarter of a ounce which is 7 1/2 grams. Most people in prison for pot are there for 10 ounces or more, which in turn results in a distributing charge. people busted for qty’s of an ounce or less will only get a slap on the wrist. If you’e got more than an ounce on you at a time, you’re more than likely selling it too.
Look it up.
For example Idaho’s law. up to 3oz you’ll get up to a year in jail and a thousand dollar fine and is only considered a misdemeanor. Possession of anything over 3 ounces is a felony and will get you up to 5 years in jail and up to a 10,000 dollar fine.
You an find state by state penalties at the NORML website.
Personally I dont find them to be too harsh.
Tom Riley, a spokesman for the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, referring to an April 2006 statement released by the FDA say “There are more teens in drug treatment for marijuana dependence than for alcohol or any other drug,”
Wonder why slu fails to point out these statistics.
They also note that recreational use can lead to addiction, and inhaling marijuana smoke is unhealthful for the lungs. Some researchers argue that marijuana may predispose heavy users to mental illnesses such as psychosis and depression.
Anonymouse,
You’re throwing a lot of statistics out there with no basis in fact. Perhaps you’d be more believeable were you to back some of this up with actual evidence.
I can show you studies such as a recent Harvard report showing a reduction in the size of lung cancer tumors after inhaling marijuana smoke or another one from the Journal of Clinical Investigations that says plant derived cannabinoids may play a role in hippocampal neurogenesis.
The 2006 statement by the FDA smacks of the old Reefer Madness philosophy and pseudo-science that the former Bush administration embraced and can hardly be classified as reliable information any more than their evidence for WMDs was.
Anonymouse,
Since when is a year in jail for misdemeanor pot possession not considered incarceration? Those are exactly what the F.B.I. stats were talking about.
We will spend around $36 million of Idaho’s 2009 corrections budget ($196 million) to jail and supervise pot offenses at the state level and that does not take into account the city and county jails. That’s a hell of a drain on resources that would be better used for schools, drug rehab, or maintaining roads and infrastructure. All because we didn’t learn our lesson from the 13 years of Prohibition (alcohol) and the destructive effect it had on this nation.
People like yourself who don’t find the penalties too harsh have your heads buried too deeply in the sand to understand what the ramifications are for a country that has 5% of the world’s population but 25% of the world’s prison population. Shame on you.
“For example Idaho’s law. up to 3oz you’ll get up to a year in jail and a thousand dollar fine and is only considered a misdemeanor.”
Wait. Going to jail for up to a year, and getting a thousand dollar fine, as well as losing your job, possibly your kids, as well as whatever else falls into place with these consequences… For simple possession of a harmless plant??!
And then the burden that is placed on tax payers, police resources, the court systems, etc…
When all of the time we could be taxing and regulating this substance?
I think our country has it bass-ackwards..
With this logic, we ought to be arresting those who consume aspirin or cola. Both of those substances are more dangerous than marijuana!
Then we could really celebrate a police state!! Yay!
Good point Meso about giving the money saved on prohibition to schools and social resources.
Right now Idaho is planning to cut $70 million dollars from the school systems.
If they taxed and regulated marijuana, they would get marijuana off the playgrounds and into a liquor store environment, and they would have more than enough to save our school system’s budget.
Prohibition is a true crime against humanity.
““There are more teens in drug treatment for marijuana dependence than for alcohol or any other drug,”
Wonder why slu fails to point out these statistics.”
I’ve already covered that, as well as putting references to judges in the system who see this problem.
Teens are forced into rehab by the court systems. There are very few voluntary admittance into rehab. Courts give teens plea deals “if you go to rehab, we will reduce your sentence”..
But here is the real issue, and this was spoke about by Judge Jim Gray, and by many of the L.E.A.P members.
Once marijuana is regulated like alcohol and tobacco. The cartels and drug dealers go out of business, because the price goes down, and the dealers can’t compete. So they stop bringing it to our kids. And with it being in a liquor store environment, underaged kids can not buy the substance.
It is clear why there are more teen users of marijuana than alcohol. Alcohol is taxed and regulated. Marijuana is not.
If we still had alcohol prohibition, and marijuana was illegal. It would be the reversed effect. More teens would be using alcohol rather than marijuana.
The damage comes from the prohibition, not the regulation.
Opps:
“If we still had alcohol prohibition, and marijuana was illegal”
I meant to say:
If we still had alcohol prohibition, and marijuana was LEGAL..
Meso, you were talking about simple possession. Simple possesion is a quarter ounce of weed, not 3 ounces. 3 ounces is a lot of pot and is a more than likely being used for more than personal use. If you have 3 ounces or more, its highly likely you’re selling most of it to make your money back in order to have some smoke for yourself no cost. I know the game.
So if your gonna do the crime be prepared to do the time. This is what we pay taxes for and I have no problem paying to keep these drug dealers, smugglers and growers behind bars. What you stoners fail to mention is most people that are smoking weed are also snorting cocaine, meth, abusing prescription drugs, etc. I was young once too and did my share of partying. Every one of us that smoked weed also experimented with other drugs, just as I’m sure you guys did. And if you didn’t you knew stoners that did.
And slu I’ve heard your gateway theory before so theres no need to repeat it. The fact is people who smoke weed also abuse alcohol and other drugs. Thats a fact. Look it up.
“Meso, you were talking about simple possession. Simple possesion is a quarter ounce of weed, not 3 ounces. ”
A 1/4 ounce is a lot of weed? Are you kidding me? I never bought less than one ounce for personal use.
Willie Nelson believes anything under a 1/4 pound is when you are running low.
1/4 ouce?!
Did I fail to mention that you can not over dose on marijuana? It’s impossible.
“The fact is people who smoke weed also abuse alcohol and other drugs. ”
The same people also started with abusing something else.
Be it food, chocolate, cola.. Addictive personalities find addictions.
The gateway come from the prohibition. Black market dealers, usually have more than one black market product to push on our school yards. Get rid of the black market (by ending prohibition) then you get rid of the black market pushers too.
Mousey,
You said up to three ounces of pot…(your words).
Why do I picture you throwing down boiler makers as you call tor the incarceration of those folks who have opted for the more benign high of marijuana?
You’re a boil on society’s ass.
gateway drug theory and prohibition have nothing to do with each other. The fact is, people who smoke weed also pop pills, get drunk on the weekends, do a little blow and whatever else they can use to get high with.
Down with dope you dope!
My work here is done.
Sorry meso, I don’t drink or smoke weed anymore. Most of us grow up and move on with life.
Since you feel the need to call people names who don’t agree with your point of view, I’ll move on to another topic.
Have a nice evening guys.
For the record I do drink coffee so according to you guys I’m an addict to it’s all good. You guys smoke your weed, I’ll drink my coffee.
Later
I don’t drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, or use prescription medications. All of those things will kill you, and cause a major addiction. Marijuana has no addictive properties, even though people do develop habits to marijuana, it’s not addictive. You don’t have physical withdraws when you quit.
Here is an average personal amount of marijuana (from someone who can afford it).
Willie Nelson gets busted with 1 pound of marijuana. And if you think Willie Nelson is selling pot, you’re crazy. No one making the kind of money that Willie does as a singer, is going to risk their freedom and career by dealing a couple thousand dollars worth of weed. That was all personal use.
See this:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/18/entertainment/main2018940.shtml
If you think 1/4 oz is a lot of weed, I think people like myself and Willie will continue to laugh in your face.
Again, did you fail to receive this? —– You can not overdose on weed —-
However, you can overdose on aspirin, and over 7500 people per year do. Marijuana is safer than aspirin, coffee, alcohol, cigarettes, and just about any prescription that you can get. That is a true fact.
And yes, prohibition is what created our black market, and our black market crime. Like alcohol, once we end prohibition most of that crime will go away. That is an easy historical fact.
“For the record I do drink coffee so according to you guys I’m an addict to it’s all good. ”
That doesn’t make you an addictive, however coffee is an addictive substance, marijuana is not.
“I don’t drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, or use prescription medications.”
BTW- I should say that I don’t drink alcohol regularly. It’s been several weeks since I’ve had a glass of wine, and before that it had been several months before I had a beer at dinner.
I don’t ‘regularly’ drink. But I don’t smoke tobacco at all, and I refuse to use those deadly prescriptions.
I love this interview, watch the end of this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjpRaBV60SE
“The officer said he would brought the music icon in under arrest, but the jails were just too full”..
So true!!! Full of non-violent drug offenders like Willie Nelson..
Folks, this is a victimless crime. I mean look at Willie Nelson, he has been smoking hordes of marijuana since he was a kid, he is 74 years old now (or 75). And he is one of the hardest working men I know of. Not only is he a successful superstar musician, but he also runs a farm, and a bio-diesel company, and has his hands in all kinds of other businesses. And look at this man go. He isn’t all messed up from weed.
ROFL.. Those who think weed is an addictive, life ruining, drug. Look at Willie! He smokes more pot than I ever have, and he is doing fine!
Slu, I’d like you to point out where I said a 1/4 ounce of weed was a lot? I never said that so stop putting words in my mouth. If you would take the time to read what people write instead of being so defensive all the time your arguments might get through. But as it stands your arguments are getting weaker and weaker.
Willie Nelson is a stoner from the 50’s When you’ve been smoking as long as he has, of course your going to build up a tolerance. He hasn’t been a musical superstar as you put it for decades. Now all of a sudden your an expert on willie nelson. Your too young to know anything about willie nelson other than what you’ve googled over the years.
Thanks for the laugh. Now go smoke another joint and chill out, I can tell your jonezin.
“Your too young to know anything about willie nelson other than what you’ve googled over the years.”
I’ve done media work for him. Thanks for the assumption.
And no, not even 3 oz’s is a lot of weed.
“He hasn’t been a musical superstar as you put it for decades”
I’ll tell ya about one of my favorite songs, even though Im not very fond of Toby Keith.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/157048/ill_never_smoke_weed_with_willie_again/
Willie still performs with all of the superstars of country and rock, at age 75!
Anonomouse;
(found it)
My wife did the graphics for this CD.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37963502@N02/3493570776/
And I did most of the programming for it.
We’ve had conversations with Willie and his agents..
I know more about Willie than you can imagine.
This one of the most positive things that Willie Nelson has done for our generation.
Snoop Dog, Willie Nelson, and several other hit artists got together and made this song “My Medicine”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvEc-2MXrX8
Willie Nelson is not only still huge in country, and the hottest country artists in country music sing with him, or write songs about him. But he is also bridging the gap between his generation and ours.
This something that Johnny Cash did as well. They brought people together. It is truly beautiful.
I like constructive behavior. All of these anonymous haters and trolls are not helping the situation with all of this negativity. I really think that we could ALL learn a lot from Willie Nelson. He is an amazing guy!
Anonymouse, you don’t know as much about drug penalties as you think you do. What about people who go to prison for using marijuana one time?
That’s right, it happens. People who are on probation or parole and flunk a urinalysis for marijuana use can and do get sent to prison all the time. For nothing more than a dirty u/a.
Look it up.
I think people who are on probation should go to prison if they fail a urine test. Come on, come up with something better than that. their on probation and should know better. If their going to risk screwing that up by smoking weed or doing drug they get what they deserve.
Yah, i believe you know and have done work for Wilie Nelson Slu. Thanks for the laugh!
Now I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell you, real cheap to.
ANNUAL AMERICAN DEATHS CAUSED BY DRUGS
TOBACCO – 400,000
ALCOHOL – 100,000
ALL LEGAL DRUGS-20,000
ALL ILLEGAL DRUGS except for MARIJUANA – 15,000
CAFFEINE – 2,000
ASPIRIN – 500
MARIJUANA – 0
Source: United States government…
National Institute on Drug Abuse,
Bureau of Mortality Statistics
Anonomouse, I posted a link here to the product that my wife and I made for Willie Nelson, but it was removed.
But anyway, this is one of my dads favorite bands “The Highway Men”.
When he died in December, I made this as a tribute to him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGSsZKa5yxk&
Dad and I played guitar together when I was very little. He taught me how to play guitar by listening to artists like Willie Nelson and Merl Haggard, and a bunch of the good ol’ boys.
Laters!
(BTW- My dad’s death is one of the reasons that I fight for cannabis legalization. Cannabis is a known cure for cancer).
oops, I meant “Anonymouse”
Update, I got another article that I wrote published in the Idaho State Journal on April 29th.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxJtA-kzQ_Q
A response:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qRBK2MYQa4
Marcus. Detramental to the blog?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut7FuAXNcZw
Thanks for being real and using your real identity. Im also glad to know a little more about your position.
Oh, I’ve typed my position quite a few times to you…you just didn’t catch it. Glad video worked.
I’ll check the vid out when I get home.
And my response:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kX3VMR4ZF14
Marcus, I know less about your position than I do people who have responded less than you. I know what you have stated. I just wasn’t sure why you and I had a problem about me posting this marijuana topic. And Maybe what is turly my problem, is that I never understood why people couldn’t just avoid this topic all together.
If so many people were outraged to a point of leaving this message board, whether it be because of redundant info, or just simply all of the bickering.. My point is that there was never any reason to get emotional over this conversation. It’s much easier to let me be the lone crazy, who is asking for marijuana law reform than it is to challenge the validity of what I post here, or how “detrimental it is to the blog”.
It takes a little effort for people who aren’t particularly interested in this topic to come here and post about how they don’t want to be posting here anymore. Then they come back for a 3rd, 4th, 5th round….
I am grateful that many people did join this conversation. And in the future, all I ask is that if people feel strongly about something, and want me to see their point of view, bring a fact. Bring a credible reference. Something.
This whole “I disagree with you, and if you agree, then you are ignorant” thing isn’t going to cut it. Prove your case.
Don’t just go after my abilities (or lack of) as a father, just because I speak out on an issue, as one user here did (not you). I wasn’t going after anyone’s family here. I wasn’t attacking below the belt. Ya know.
I may have used facts that were redundant, but all but very few times I used new resources. New supporters, who had different careers (judges, law enforcement, Harvard professor(s), etc) saying the same things. But I always tried to get fresh resources, even if I used the same information.
I figured, even if someone is going to bicker with me, maybe if I post new resources, they can relate with one of them. Maybe they respect and admire police officers more than I judge, so I used a judge (Judge Gray), and a law enforcement agent (Chief of Police of Seattle, ret). Then I threw in a few Harvard Professors. Ya know. Same facts, different faces. All very credible people.
The one thing that was unpleasant about this conversation, is when someone who challenge one of my references, but really never come up with any reasons that discredited one source or another. Or did I miss that too Marcus?
But that is why I enjoy your point of view. I admit, I may have missed a lot of things. I try to re-read each post more than once, so I can get a fresh POV on the topic, incase I read something wrong the first time. (often that’s why I repost, several times in a row. Because I can’t edit).
I am currently uploading my YouTube response. And btw, thanks again for your conversation. Serious man!
Here is one of my video responses. I wanted to share this one with you most.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF45zbrH2Rs
I have to fade out for the night. I got a lot of things to do.
Peace! (thanks again)
Near the top of the page “Your New Comments” lists all comments recently made. I can’t speak for everyone, but it is pretty much the sole topic listing that I use. Every now and then I check out the first two or three stories on the front page to make sure that nothing new has been posted, but for the rest of my commentary it comes straight from the “Your New Comments” box.
On an opinion blog it is not realistic to ask folks to post their opinion and back it up by fact…it’s impossible unless your opinion is based entirely around fact. You back up your opinions with opinions of other, highly credible people. You can throw out a spreadsheet of current prison resources dedicated to marijuana arrests as well as usage percentages based on gathered survey data and state that we’ll save X amount of dollars and actually increase tax revenue…but it is all based on theory. So, whether it’s credible or not, it is not solid fact because it has not been put into practice.
As far as medical issues go, not a lot of research data comes out of this country. We have laws in place that restricts the use of marijuana, which greatly reduces the amount of scientists / research groups that want to try and overcome legal bounds to do so. For example, some groups state that marijuana causes birth defects, while other groups say the opposite. I know a local girl that had no problem smoking weed through her pregnancy, and when asked why she stated “There’s no proof that it causes harm to the child.”
The immediate effects of the plant are well known. Continued use effects are relatively unknown. For the most part these facts are word of mouth (I knew somebody that knows this guy…), and studies, as I mentioned before, don’t generally happen because of the legal status of possession and use of the drug.
Still, some research has been done, people have spoken out for and against it, and fact or not one way or the other, people are going to be for and against it. You’re not going to convert people with barrages of mixed fact / opinion…you’re only going to cause them to put up their defenses and stand by their immediate opinion (in most cases). Look at tobacco and alcohol.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that you’re not going to convert a blog full of free-thinking opinionated folks to drop their current thoughts and support this cause, whether it will be good for the country (in the form of tax revenue and reduced incarceration costs) and the medical field or not. By continuing to throw the information out there without doing what you ask everybody else to do, consider what others are saying and comment constructively / positively, you’re contributing to an ongoing argument that cannot be won.
Don’t stop posting your thoughts. Don’t stop putting up new articles about your newest rally / protest / progress. Just cool your jets some on trying to get everybody to jump on board. We all have different ideas about what the best way to handle x, y or z is…and most of us are steadfast and unmoving. Even worse, a lot of us don’t seem to realize that we can’t pummel the other side into agreeing with us, whether it be by opinion, fact or force.
@Marcus:
You say “On an opinion blog it is not realistic to ask folks to post their opinion and back it up by fact…it’s impossible unless your opinion is based entirely around fact.”
No on an opinion issue, that is something else entirely.
People ‘refuted’ my facts with opinions sometimes, and they couldn’t back up their opinions, because they were opinions and not facts.
I don’t know if they were the same anonymous guest or a different one, but it appeared several times, that the same guest who was demanded that I back up my numbers (I believe you asked me this too), was the guest who is trying to refute my sources with opinion. It was a complete oxy-moron. But whatever. Hope you enjoy the videos. One is still uploading. I’ll check on it tomorrow. G’night.
Oh, sorry, I have to give you one more FACT here. From a clinical study that went on for decades in Jamaica.
You say: “The immediate effects of the plant are well known. Continued use effects are relatively unknown. For the most part these facts are word of mouth (I knew somebody that knows this guy…), and studies, as I mentioned before, don’t generally happen because of the legal status of possession and use of the drug.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9WorIM0RhA
“Melanie Dreher, RN, PhD, FAAN explains her cannabis and pregnancy research study in Jamaica. Pregnant women and their children were studied for over ten plus years, both marijuana smokers and non-users.”
Long term effects have been studied in many studies.
Jamaica is not the United States my friend. I’m not discounting the study, but there is a whole hell of a lot of difference between the product available there and the product available here, as well as cultural differences.
“Jamaica is not the United States my friend.”
That is not the point. You said that the long term effects of marijuana are relatively unknown.
I am saying that MANY studies have been done on the long term effects, from credible and qualified researchers.
A human body is a human body. And if anything, people in Jamaica smoke WAY more weed than people in the US. Weed is weed. No one has proved to me that Jamaicans have anatomy that resists long term effects of marijuana better than an American. And no one has proved to me that Jamaican pot is different than US pot.
See this is the point. You are refuting my answers to you with opinions. Do you have any facts?
Also, another point, and you and I have both stated this before. Im glad we can agree.
With marijuana being a schedule 1 drug, it is not easily researched. If the researchers can’t obtain qualified (by the FDA) weed, then they can’t get any validation on their studies by the gov.
The US government grows marijuana, and distributes marijuana to 5 patients in the USA. But that is just because they have carried over their supply to these individuals for the last 25 years. There used to be 12 of them, now 7 are dead, so there is 5 left.
But the US gov is not giving any new patients weed, and they are not allowing weed to be researched further for beneficial uses.
So therefor we must rely on research done outside of the USA. But that’s not hard, Canada, Australia, many European nations have taken the lead in this. The USA is falling far behind.
It’s interesting to know that the USA government has a patent on marijuana.
Check this out:
http://digitaljournal.com/article/257008
check out US Patent 6630507 titled “Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants”
Can check this out, Montel Williams interviews on of the medical marijuana patients of the Federal Government.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0ncXkusB3Q
Yeah, the government KNOWS marijuana is good. They are just catering to lobbyists with big bucks, and keeping this wonderful substance illegal. It’s B.S.!!
Don’t know if anyone is following what’s going on in Hailey but here are a few links. Legalization of marijuana has been one of the hot topics over there the last 6 mos or so.
http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?ID=2005116994 http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?ID=2005125932
Reader, it was an injustice what has happned there. Citizens of Hailey have voted and legalized marijuana there twice, and the last time a judge over ruled it.
I have a campaign to oust the constition hating leadership in Hailey. They won’t get re-elected, if they keep negating the will of the people.
I wrote letters to them;
http://xcannabis.com/2009/04/shame-on-the-city-of-hailey-idaho/
LOL, I cannot maintain my silence on this one. The people of Hailey can vote to legalize Marijuana all they want to, and as long as their judges and police department are following the laws they’re are sworn to uphold, their votes will continue to be struck down as illegal.
Municipalities can’t establish ordinances that are contrary to State Law any more than States can pass laws that are contrary to Federal Law.
There’s a whole article hidden in those two paragraphs and when ole Joe gets around to posting it you’ll have another pot topic to focus some of your attention on.
Denver legalized a few years ago. Their laws are still in place on legalized marijuana up to an ounce.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPTcYBSygjU
I’m all about state’s rights over federal government.
http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm
Two days ago I read, and I can’t find the source now, that less than 30 grams of pot had been placed in a lower classification in the CSA schedule, even below class 5, but the fact that I can’t find it again leads me to think that it was a product of WIKI research which is always suspect.
The fact remains, that the Denver law is is contrary to Colorado State Law and can be struck down at any time. It can also be struck down at any time by Federal Law. The fact that the law isn’t being enforced YET doesn’t mean that the DEA isn’t going to get a wild hair up its ass and start arresting people in Denver who are carrying around “legal” 1 ounce bags of reefer.
Those bags have to be coming from somebody who’s carrying around numerous 1 ounce bags and the DEA is going to rip them apart.
Not that I think they should. This is just a matter of law.
And you have to remember, Hailey is in Idaho, our legislature will be one of the last to approve of any sort of marijuana legislation. Conservatism of our sort dies very slowly.
On a personal note. I’ve expressed a lot of animosity toward this topic, and I think the biggest reason for it is your form of delivery Ryan. It takes a respectable amount of time for a person to research and write a piece for insertion here. From my experience, it only takes a few keystrokes to search for the youtube vid that says something close to what you want, and insert it into a post.
So buddy, if you’re going to carry on an intelligent conversation here, do it in your own words, do it in print, and do it without attacking other members comments. It takes thought and intellectual work to do that. I’d love to read some of what you have to say without the vids and cut and paste rantings you’ve fallen back on so frequently here.
Speaking as someone who has been on the wrong end of a governmental sting operation (a totally useless one, but a sting nonetheless) I can almost guarantee that the DEA is already watching people in Denver who think they are doing nothing wrong.
They may have passed a law in their city, but Untwisted is 100% correct. Whenever someone on a state or federal level decides that it will be in their best interest, they will crack down and heads will roll.
http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/ongoing/pipedreams.html
No one is really safe with these laws till there is legalization on the federal level.
I would hate to think it would take another Timothy McVey or his ilk to bring attention to heavy handed feds but I lnoticed that shortly after the DEA raided a pot dispensing machines in L.A.. several months ago, a pipe bomb was thrown through a door at the federal building in San Diego.
Don’t tread on me…may again be the battle cry.
@untwisted, Im not going to dig up all of these baggage from this conversation, but on the point of posting my own words as opposed to just simply posting a youtube link.
This isn’t a challenge, but you are welcome to count the posts if you like. More of the posts in this thread are my own words, and I have very thoughtfully put hundreds and hundreds of hours into this conversation, starting way before I arrived in Idaho or on Idaho Falls Today.
Many of the videos, are me and my own words, bravely expressing my point of view to an audience of people that have for the most part, have not wanted to actually talk about the issues, but wanted to attack either the method, or the links, or the frequency. Instead of offering a discussion, whether pro or con, on the issue at hand. Many of the people (probably not most, but many) that have participated here have tried to change the topic from “Marijuana legalization”, but rather “How do we shut down this topic”….
My advice to you, is stick to the topic, let the rest fall into place.
@Marcus. Great link, you are absolutely right about our 10th Amendment rights. That is an absolute treasure of a document! Thanks for posting it!
Slu
Below you’ll find the five rules of propaganda, which you are adept at using, your textual postings show that. Please excuse my link, I hate to use them but you can find them at
http://www.jessiepaul.com/2006/01/5-rules-of-propaganda.html
Beneath the five rules of propaganda you’ll find each of your links, presented in the order in which you posted them. If anyone would care to run a spreadsheet on them I’m sure we’d all be amused at the amount of repetition found with them.
#1 The rule of simplification: reducing all data to a simple confrontation between ‘Good and Bad’, ‘Friend and Foe’.
#2 The rule of disfiguration: discrediting the opposition by crude smears and parodies.
#3The rule of transfusion: manipulating the consensus values of the target audience for one’s own ends.
#4 The rule of unanimity: presenting one’s viewpoint as if it were the unanimous opinion of all right-thinking people: draining the doubting individual into agreement by the appeal of star-performers, by social pressure, and by ‘psychological contagion’.
#5 The rule of orchestration: endlessly repeating the same messages in different variations and combinations.
Rule #2 is rarely resorted to by any sophisticated marketer. Rule #5 is a given. Rules #1 and #4 seem to be the key to success of many dial-a-quotes and celebs!
http://xcannabis.com/2009/04/judge-says-californians-would-benefit-25-billion-per-year/
http://xcannabis.com/2008/12/more-information-on-the-cure-for-cancer/
http://xcannabis.com/2009/02/senate-bill-5615/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KLy150NR_U
http://xcannabis.com/2008/09/addadhd-cannabis-remedy/
http://xcannabis.com/2009/03/hemp-for-victory/
http://images.google.com/images?q=cannabis%20medicine%20bottle&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mo
zilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8xxbw_tax-day-protest-marijuana-tax-and-r_news
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfp25vJZ_5k
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6696582420128930236
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfp25vJZ_5k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJcVr0GLsEA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS2sUbG10Wo
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8xxbw_tax-day-protest-marijuana-tax-and-r_news
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090316001228AAzqpEx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGSsZKa5yxk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KLy150NR_U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gpknxe8-xo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gpknxe8-xo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMG6xJT1MbY
http://www.hempfest.org/
http://youtube.com/xcannabiscom
http://twitter.com/xcannabis
http://myspace.com/xcannabis
http://dailymotion.com/xcannabis
http://apps.facebook.com/causes/125809?m=96aaaf39
http://causes.com/xcannabis
http://xcannabis.com/2009/03/going-to-hempfest-in-idaho/
http://www.dailymotion.com/related/x927d5/video/x91d9l_family-guy-420_shortfilms?h
mz=74616272656c61746564
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuqvcMDqMn8&feature=related
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28621704
http://stash.norml.org/mma-fighter-nick-diaz-says-smoking-marijuana-is-part-of-his
-plan/
http://stash.norml.org/jets-de-ellis-charged-with-marijuana-possession/
http://www.celebstoner.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VY8rZk-csQ&feature=channel_page
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNS6U6oVBjk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH8OW7mw8IM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6UpqmGC2dM
http://www.idahofallstoday.com/2008/04/13/three-steps-to-end-our-war-on-drugs/comm
ent-page-2/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkrQDh8FBVw
http://www.amazon.com/Drug-War-Crimes-Consequences-Prohibition/dp/0945999909/ref=s
r_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1237063158&sr=1-1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLZ5mXroW_E&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH8OW7mw8IM
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/mironreport.html
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=8BACCD0DA16FE246
http://www.judgejimgray.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RWfCwl0lZo
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GXQ4xSgIuY
http://www.leap.cc/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LayaGk0TMDc
http://blog.mpp.org/category/tax-and-regulate/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSCd-1IVYY
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_correctional_population_timeline.gif
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Incarceration_rates_worldwide.gif
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_incarceration_timeline-clean.gif
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/p05.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_drugs
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/18/entertainment/main2018940.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjpRaBV60SE
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/157048/ill_never_smoke_weed_with_willie_again/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37963502@N02/3493570776/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvEc-2MXrX8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGSsZKa5yxk&
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxJtA-kzQ_Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut7FuAXNcZw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF45zbrH2Rs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9WorIM0RhA
http://digitaljournal.com/article/257008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0ncXkusB3Q
http://xcannabis.com/2009/04/shame-on-the-city-of-hailey-idaho/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPTcYBSygjU
I think your campaign here is little more than a propaganda campaign seeking to further your cause. I’ve suggested in the past that you should focus your efforts on applying pressure through legal channels. but you’re not going to do that. You’re going to keep doing what you do and people are going to keep getting arrested for breaking the law.
Tough place to be in, having as much passion as you do and not being willing to work within the system.
@untwisted.
“#2 The rule of disfiguration: discrediting the opposition by crude smears and parodies.”
That was used on me several times. The smear campaign has continued from day one, before I had a lot of questions about sources that I had to answer. One was that I was an irresponsible parent. Then there was a recent accusation that I was using too many links. That I was “turning this site into a marijuana link site”. Etc..
I had people say things like: Anonymouse says: “You don’t seem to want to point out all the information on anything. You pick and choose what you want people to know and the fact is, people aren’t going to prison for petty marijuana possession”
In which, I replied with more references.
Then I got this from Marcus:
“slu2, you’re posting figures, please cite your sources. Math is fine and dandy, but anybody can throw a number out there and multiply it by another number.”
Untwisted, when I wasn’t posting enough references for the facts I presented, more and more requests came in for me to back up my facts. Which I did. Thus, the links..
You have spent more time in this thread trying to take this topic down, rather than discussing the topic. I think between contributing too much, or not contributing much at all. I would rather be a high achiever than being an antagonist.
“I’ve suggested in the past that you should focus your efforts on applying pressure through legal channels. but you’re not going to do that.”
I am going to do what anyone lobbying for legal change does. I am going to get media, I am going to protest, and I am going to write my officials.
In fact, I had done all of that before you gave me any suggestions. I wrote every single representative/senator in Idaho, and I have an active petition going for Idaho, that I be presenting when we write up a Bill.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/33/legalize-marijuana-in-Idaho
&
http://xcannabis.com/2009/04/letters-from-a-few-of-my-state-reps/
I will continue to use legal channel as well, and I will also continue to present this issue to the public for more discussion.
Going at it at only 1 side of this, or another… I don’t think that will be very effective. One must approach law reform in two ways. Approach the voters, and approach the law makers. Im doing both.
Thanks for the advice untwisted, but I think you are still talking way more about how inappropriate this conversation is in you POV, and not talking about the conversation. You keep missing the actual topic. IMHO
No Slu, I’m stepping away from the propaganda, and you’re right, there’s been propaganda on both sides. Here’s how you address the problem. BTW it’s good to see that you’ve been getting active on the legal portion of this problem too.
You’re going to have to cull some of the signatures though because the governor of Idaho isn’t interested in the opinions of anyone other than his constituents. And there’s a problem with internet polls. You can’t verify where people come from or how many times they sign. The creation of dynamic IP’s is too easy to make IP identification a valid identification tool.
The only way we’re going to change things is to put pressure on the elected officials who can actually do something about the problem we face. State legislators are loath to waste their time writing laws that are in direct opposition to Federal Law. So, we need to place pressure on Federal Lawmakers. We need to write or email our Senators and House of Representatives members letting them know what we want to have happen. We want Marijuana taken off the Controlled Substances List, treated the same as alcohol, and taxed accordingly.
You need to spend some time getting your connections in different states to contact their Senators and Representatives. Make it easier for them, supply your friends with their Senators and Reps email addresses. Have them do the same thing with their friends. That’s the way to conduct a grass roots internet campaign.
Place a PLEA on your website that your visitors email their Senators and Representatives, let them know that as long as the DEA has Marijuana on the list, they’re going to keep busting smokers. Do 100 YouTube videos on the subject, but spend your time focusing on the people who need to hear the message you want to get out, and have your listeners and readers send those gray haired old men about 1,000 emails a day for a very long time.
Eventually they’ll get around to writing a bill, telling the DEA that Pot has to come off the list. At that time the ball will fall into the laps of the individual states. Each state will have to deal with it’s own constituents on the question of whether or not pot will be legal in their state, because they won’t have the excuse of a Federal Law tying their hands.
There, no propaganda, all solution, that ball is in your court now. Pretty big job eh? Linda like getting the vote for the ladies.
“BTW it’s good to see that you’ve been getting active on the legal portion of this problem too.”
Well, I started that before I came to this message board. March 29th is my first signature on the petition.
“We need to write or email our Senators and House of Representatives members letting them know what we want to have happen. ”
Agreed. Again, this is something that I have already done. But I hope more people do this as well. It’s going to take the voice of more than one person.
“Place a PLEA on your website that your visitors email their Senators and Representatives”
Done that too, reference the last link. Im trying to lead by example. I have done everything that you are suggesting.
Have you done anything? Is anyone else doing anything? I hope so.
You’re right about an internet campaign. It’s tricky. But that’s why Im also taking it to the streets. And I just made a regular local internet radio station as well, in hopes to inspire others to discuss this topic more.
But the key is to get other’s involved. There is no use in proposing law reform, if the voters aren’t behind it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvFiHM0rPY4&feature=related
CA Leagalization coversation;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sQkc2gPbbA
Fast video indexer is a video capture software that can capture video frames automatically from a list of videos and create index web pages, index pictures or a list of images
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99F5CG80&show_article=1
You know, no matter how one feels about taxing marijuana, this number is mind-boggling!!!