IFPD…needs to get priorities straight?

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to the newsletter or RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Last week we had an incident near my house on 2nd st where a drunken couple were fighting in their front yard…it culminated with the man throwing a beer bottle at the woman..missing and putting a hole in the side of the elderly neighbors house.

This was reported the the police department, who took over 45 minutes to show up…all the while we watched an officer with a speed trap less then a mile away. The officer finally arrived, and took a report. While taking his report, the couple started walking back from the bar, beer in hand. Upon seeing the officer, they put the beers behind a truck while the officer watched. The officer then place the drunken man in front of the 90 year old lady, and asked her what she wanted him to do. The terrified senior simply told the officer “I dont know” the officer then rolled his eyes at her, and told the drunken man he needed to fix her house. The couple then went into the back yard of their apartment, where they got into another screaming match while the officer ignored it. At this time a car went the wrong way down our road, and the officer completely blew off this situation, to go chase the wrong way driver for a simple driving violation.

I may be wrong, but it seems that there are speed traps all over this city, while people that need help are being put off or ignored completely. If domestic abuse, open container, littering and vandalism are simple crimes compared to wrong way drivers, then i must have missed something.

Maybe they will get some attention to this situation when this man finally kills his girlfrind in a methed out fit of rage. just remember where your taxes go!

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

HOLY…2008!

I’m glad I don’t live in your neighborhood, race_fan_8_15. Then again, if the community and our peace keeping officers don’t step up to the challenges the couple, and unfortunate elderly neighbor you’ve described as well as yourself live in, we may all live in your kind of neighborhood very soon.

“If domestic abuse, open container, littering and vandalism are simple crimes compared to wrong way drivers, then i must have missed something.”

You missed nothing, race_fan_8_15, but the officer did. He could only chase and ticket the crime he witnessed. That doesn’t make him bad, just human.

Did you tell the officer that you were a witness to the drunk man’s crimes?


Race Fan…did you report this incident to the Chief of Police?. I’t’s pretty sad when the Officer would put the knucklehead infront of the lady and add to the stress she was probably already under, she was probably intimidated by the drunk a$$wipe and the cop should of seen that…wait he was probably late for his coffee on the midshift.


Hey there Idaho, good point about the priorities. Traffic crimes produce revenue with little court cost or officer time, domestic crime is costly and time consuming.

If I was running around packing a pistol, pepper spray, a tazer, handcuffs and a belt full of other goodies, as well as having a shotgun and whatever else in my specially- designed- for- detainment vehicle, I would pick and choose who I wanted to mess with, too.

“To Serve and Protect” was taken off the cars a long time ago.


Actually Wendyjo…..the numbered streets are quite nice and a wonderful neighborhood to live in. Unfortunately the one way streets produce lots of speeders and those who just don’t care. We have a lot of renters who rent from slum lords in our historic neighborhood. I have had issues of my own with fighting neighbors and speeders and people driving the wrong way. The response that I have received from officers who have responded to my calls is pathetic and quite frankly I am too intimidated to call on anything that I see or hear on my block these days. Complaints really need to go right to the Chief of Police or the Mayor.


There is still alot of the Livsey mind set in the IFPD. An us against them attitude that needs to be done away with. I think that the Mayor Furhiman and Chief of Police Roos are headed in the right direction in trying to change that. I am hoping the attitude of protect and serve will replace the para-military attitude that some of the IFPD officers have had in the past. I greatly appreciate those who are on the force that have the correct mind set and their heart is in the right place. They are the ones that don’t use their badge and firearms as tools for intimidation and are on massive control/ego trips. They are the ones that truly care and appreciate the public that they serve. They are the ones that treat people like citizens instead of second rate animals that are wasting their time. I truly believe that getting names of officers, or their plate numbers, and then letting the Chief or the Mayor know when they have done something good, or when they are being jerks and acting against the oath that they have taken. Some of these officers are one way around their supervisors and a complete different person when serving the public and the Chief needs to know how his force is acting when working, both the good and the bad.


So other than happy cops has there really been a change in the Police Department since Livsey left?

After reading what they were asking for in to paper I wonder if he (Livsey) ever asked for that much?


I’ve met a few good IF police officers, and I’ve met a whole hell of a lot of bad ones. Overall, I think the traffic quotas should go…there are no quotas at the county and state level, and they still have funding to do their jobs.

If I’m wrong about quotas, let me know.


Quotas happen everywhere. Every city and state I’ve lived in they’ve had quotas and they’ve been alot higher than this city I can assure you. People complain alot about speed traps around IF, but I personally don’t think there all that bad. At least not compared to the other cities I’ve lived. Although I don’t like them, I think their necessary to a certain extent to remind the public to keep their speed down and to drive safetly. I also don’t think they pull people over unnecessarily around here.


I’ve never lived on the numbered streets, or on the West side of town, Angie. The infrequent times I’ve been in the area it appears well kept and quiet. I guess just like in any area of town, problems to arise. Thankfully, I’ve only had problems anywhere I’ve lived with a couple of cranky neighbors.

In one neighborhood, a next door neighboor hated it if when we watered our lawn, and our water got on his lawn. Weird man. In another neighborhood, when my daughter was about 6, and her best friend who lived down the street was about 5, our next door neighbor had her yard toilet papered. That neighbor was a young, female teacher at the local high school. I wasn’t surprised. My parents were both teachers at my high school while growing up, and even though we lived in the country we occasionally arrived home to little surprises. The neighbor who lived across the street from me called the police and told them that my 6 year old daughter and her 5 year old friend had toilet papered my neighbor’s yard. The police came to my home, and I told the police that the woman was crazy and often times caused trouble in the neighborhood although this was the first time she’d targeted me and my child. I let them know my neighbor was a teacher and that it was most likely her students who’d toilet papered her yard, and that it wasn’t possible that my small child and her small friend could have gathered all the supplies needed to have toilet papered all the huge trees in that yard. The police thanked me for my time and left.

Some people are really, really crazy. I’ve got more stories about crazy neighbors but they might ready here so I’ll not type them.


Did anyone see the incident on CNN about the guy getting tasered? Are we sure this isn’t IFPD not NYPD? Those tasers are like toys to our officers. Their police certification requires that they be able to handle an unruly suspect without the use of tasers. We’ve handled criminals for years without having to use tasers. Now that they’ve got them, there doesn’t seem to be a single suspect who can be handcuffed and arrested without the assistance of the taser. What’s up with that?

As to the incident above, the officers I know who were most recently assigned to that patrol area definitely have an attitude that the people in that patrol area have seceded from the union and the constitution has been suspended. The elderly lady is a tax payer, thus she is the employer of that officer and Chief Roos. Maybe race_fan can help her write a letter to the chief and the Post Register. Not that it will do any good, but she can know that she tried.

I too think Chief Roos is trying, but how exactly do you stop an avalanche? That’s what he inherited.


Did anyone see the IFPD PR shoot on Ch8 a few days ago…Their Tatical Team training in the Civic Auditorium?. IFPD is big on PR, letting the public know they have a SWAT Team and how that SWAT Team operates…just what some potential nutcase needs to see. IFPD, the Chain of Command from the top down, needs to get out with the public, NOT by showing SWAT Tactics, but shake some hands, ask people whats going on in their neighborhood, talk to kids, chat it up with seniors and most of all address the problems brought to their attention!.


It is up to us as citizens to get to know our neighbors and do our part to make our neighborhoods safe. The cops aren’t going to be able to do anything other than bring more force. And they would rather be catching speeders. Stand up for your neighbors and they will stand with you when you need it.


Incidents like the drunken husband and wife fight are always hard for the police to resolve well and easily. If an officer arrests one or both of them, it just causes more fighting, and the neighbors get sucked in further. I watched it happen time after time with some of my neighbors a decade ago.

If just the presence of a cop doesn’t cool the situation down, it becomes a judgement call for the officer. The most effective cop I saw let my neighbors know that he had better not hear of another complaint in the next 24 hours, or they were both going to jail, and their kids would be sent to Child Protection. That usually stopped the fight for a week or so. These neighbors didn’t last long- as soon as I talked to the guy who owned the house they rented, they were kicked out.

Boina’s right- if some neighbors step in, the jerks tend to cool their behaviour. The better one knows who’s who on their block, the more peaceful things become. A block party is a great way of introducting yourselves and getting to know each other.


Wow, another cop bashing article! Shocking!!

Where to start. First of all there is no ticket quota at the IFPD. They did have one where they were required to write five a month. That was done away with a couple a years ago. I love though wherever a cop is using his radar it’s called a speed trap. With that thought process why even have speed limits then?

Second there are different divisions inside a police department. Such as patrol, detectives, narcotics, and you guessed it a traffic unit. Those who have any understanding know about these different units. The traffic units do accidents, traffic complaints, and tickets all of their shift.

It’s amazing to me how many cops actually choose to work for this city. The majority of this article is about how much you people hate your cops.

Why is it always suprising that there are some bad apples that work at the police dept. I’m sure there are bad apples who work at the fire dept., electrical dept, and public works dept. You’re going to find that in EVERY job across the US. If you’re honest with yourself I’ve bet anyone here has given a bad taste to the public, or customer, to where they have worked at some time in their life. I’m not arogant enough to say I haven’t.

Now you can blog about how much I love the police and they can do no wrong. The other bloggers love that one anytime someone sticks up for the police. Either way whether you agree with me or not doesn’t matter. Rather than whining about the problem why don’t you become a GOOD Cop that this city so desperately needs.!


@#14

I think everyone on this board understands the need for Police in a city, and I think everyone on this board also understands that in any group of people there might be ‘a few bad apples.’ However, I think when it comes to police officers, people expect a higher degree of service, being that police are in charge of protecting the city, and preserving the peace, not just in charge of getting me food service, or something trivial.


Here’s an interesting Idaho Falls cop link:

http://www.ratemycop.com/index.php?st=ID&letter=&dept=13274

Enjoy.


Just to put a positive spin on the topic, a few of the positive things that have come out of the IFPD recently is the relentless pursuit to knock the gangs down through out the city. About 6 months ago the gang violence, vandalism, and growth was overwhelming. With the commitment of a few officers with the IFPD the gang problem was tracked and the officers selectively harrassed the gang members into submission. You can say you were a victim or you can say it was a positive thing that happened but regardless the community is now a better place that the gangs have been identified and are inactive or in jail.
Not to say the Sheriff’s office isn’t doing its job but the gang problems seem to have moved toward the east side of town especially into Mobile Home Estates. Hopefully they will harrass the gang members into relocating near Blackfoot, SLC, or Las Vegas. Prison would be okay as well.
The IFPD has increased its Narcotics division to combat the drug use in the area and along with the Idaho Meth Project we have seen a decrease in meth use.
Not bad for a city that will let its electrical and fire departments be unionized but not the police department. Red-headed stepchild? Oh well at least people don’t like us. . . that helps too. We should have been firemen.


“With the commitment of a few officers with the IFPD the gang problem was tracked and the officers selectively harrassed the gang members into submission.”

I’m not sure I really want to nitpick this statement to death, IFPD is Needed, so I will simply ask if you meant this the way that I read it. Are you saying IFPD officers are harrassing citizens of our city? Criminals or not, they are still citizens and constitutionally and statutorily protected against the literal definition of harassment. Why would only a few participate in this “harassment?” Shouldn’t all officers on the force be on the lookout for “evidence” of criminal activity? I don’t want gangs or drug dealers out there any more than the next guy, but I don’t want anyone’s constitutionally guaranteed civil rights violated either. Who is making the decision about whose rights can be violated and whose can’t? Chief Roos or the officer on the street? But maybe I didn’t read this the way that you meant it. Can you clarify?

I would agree that the police are necessary and there are only a few bad apples. Too bad the entire force is willing to let themselves be painted as bad guys rather than run off the few bad apples so we don’t have anyone to complain about. Why is that?


I think you need to understand what the person, presumably an officer, meant by harassing them out of town. When dealing with gang members its often hard to get them on anything major. Oh you know they are behind many of the major incidents but their “victims” are usually rival gang members who refuse to cooperate with police. Thats why in the rash of drive by shootings this summer, there were ten or so, hardly anyone got arrested because it was rival gang vs rival gang and none of them wanted police involvement.

So the way to get rid of this kind of influence is to “harass” them all out of town by charging them with anything anytime they do something wrong. It doesn’t mean their rights are being violated, it just means they are being shown no mercy or leniency any time they are involved in something. If they jaywalk charge them, if they park illegally charge them, if they drive on a suspended license take them to jail instead of citing and releasing them, basically charge them any and every time you can and soon they’ll move someplace else.

Its not ideal but really the only way to deal with certain types of crime and societal problems is to push it onto someone else. Police cannot solve the societal problems that cause crime, they can only try to manage the crime.


As far as I’m concerned if you’re involved in gangs and criminal activity, screw your civil rights! I could care less how you’re treated. These people chose to break the law, rob, mug people, rape, deal drugs among many other things. I could really care less how their treated by our fine officers. Run them out of town for good for all I care. Good riddance! Get out and stay out.


Getting rid of bad apples in a job should be done in a fair and legal manner too. I think #18’s comment apply’s in this situation too. Proof should be needed in any job in order to terminate them.

Bottom line is many people don’t like any police in general when they’re in trouble. Who here is happy about getting a speeding ticket? Who here is happy having the police come into their home when there’s a problem, and having them tell you what to do? And no one likes being in jail.

Comment #17 was funny about being firemen. People love firemen because they don’t enforce any rules. If the fire and police dept. were combined, I’m willing to bet we would hate having to deal with firemen.

I could see why you would want to be a firemen though. Not only because of local perception but that’s pretty much the perception across the nation.


I’ll tell you exactly why people don’t like cops. Because 95% of them didn’t join the force to “serve and protect” our community. They joined the force so they could have power and privelages that civilians don’t have. Of course some are worse than others, but it’s been my observation over the years that most cops didn’t become officers to “make a difference” in their communities. All too often cops go in with good intentions but get sucked into this powertrip and it’s all over from there.


Here we go again another person who knows all the reasons on why police officers became police officers. 


Anonymous (in #19)
Thank you for attempting to explain what you believe was meant by the post, but I think I would prefer to hear what was really meant by the person who posted it. As to showing them no mercy, how is your explanation any different from what happens to the average citizen, not gang member? The cops don’t show mercy to anyone that I know. They are told, from on high, that all crimes, no matter how miniscule, are to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I don’t know of any person driving on a suspended license who was not arrested and taken to jail rather than cited. I believe it’s in the procedure manual that due to overcrowding in the system, anyone who can be cited rather than arrested is to be cited, but I have never seen this applied. If there’s a choice, to my knowledge, the officers have always chosen the arrest. I do not claim to know why. Even a drunk driver can be cited if there is someone to drive them home. Do you know of anyone who hasn’t been arrested, who could have been cited?

As to Guest in #20, civil rights are applicable to everyone, but most often not needed by anyone who isn’t confronted by law enforcement. Comment #22 by AppleJack is important if his observation is correct. If we run all the criminals out of town, and the police are just there to bully people, who is going to be left to be bullied? Your average, law-abiding citizen. Do you think if these officers don’t have criminals to bully they won’t bully anyone? I don’t. I think they’ll start bullying everyone they run into, whether they deserved it or not. I think AppleJack has grossly overstated the percentage, but I do believe we have a few officers, the few bad apples, who like jerking people around. On other threads, I have read lots of posts from people who have tried to complain about being mistreated and are absolutely and completely ignored. Which takes me to #21, by Commenting. How do we get rid of the few bad apples if our complaints are ignored?


After the cops chase all of the other gangs out of town, who’s gonna to chase the cops out of town?


Which cops are you people running into that you have such bad opinions of our officers? I’ve been pulled over for running a light, for turning improperly, and for hitting the car in front of me (I can’t remember how they worded that ticket). Without exception each officer was polite, explained everything that was going on, and answered all my questions. I’ve NEVER felt treated unfairly and knew I was in the wrong even though I didn’t purposefully disobey the law. Nor did I attempt to argue with the officer; recognizing they were doing their job.

And I’m HAPPY they are here, keeping me and all of our citizens in line with the LAW! If it weren’t for them our streets and neighborhoods would be unsafe, and not just unruly kids and hoodlums would be making them unsafe - anybody having a bad day, or any thoughtless individual would be helping cause to the terrorism of that potential madness.

I don’t wear hats, so my turn signal is off to all you officers, and I’ll only use it when making a legal turn. Thanks for helping to make this city, my city, the one I call home a safe one to live in. SALU!


Oh! I remembered how they worded the ticket when I rear-ended the car in front of me: “Inattentive Driving,” and they were right. See, I was returning from Pocatello after working a 12 hour shift, and I was tired. I had a couple of books on the dash board, was coming to a stop light on Yellowstone and my books started to fall off so I reached up to stop them - BAM! Right into the car in front of me. Thankfully his car wasn’t hurt too bad, and my Toyota just had a little bumper damage. The officer was very nice. The ticket was kind of expensive, but my insurance agent was nice, too.

I hate 12 hour shifts and working in Pocatello.
But I don’t do that anymore, so the police don’t have to worry about me, no they don’t!


Another Guest,

What town are you living in? Citing instead of arresting suspended drivers happens all the time in this down. In fact it’s down right unfair.

The continous repeat offenders should be taken to jail. What’s their punishment for driving on a supended license… a longer sentence of having your license suspended. Yeah that’s a real good lesson they will learn to not drive again.

In regards to getting rid of bad apples complaints don’t get ignored it they are substanstiated. You wouldn’t want to be fired from your job unless there was some type of proof to show why. I haven’t heard of any personal, detailed, complaint that was blatantly ignored.

It is common for us as people to say, “nothing was done” when our complaint isn’t substanstiated. I would be curious to know from those commenting about nothing being done. If it was me I would have not problem stating the details, officer to whom the problems is with and the supervisor who said we aren’t going to do anything.

I’m guessing this is the case because we have not heard such events. I’ll echo my comments again. No matter what job you are in you should have proof in order to have someone fired.


Why would you want someone that is suspended to be cited and released. They are already disreguarding a court or ITD order. They have had their warnings and are thumbing their nose at the punnishment. They should go to jail.


This practice is pretty standard. If someone gets picked up for driving while suspended, they get cited (and released) once they get someone with a license to drive. They can be taken to jail but that is at the discretion of police.

We also have to remember that former Gov. Phil Batt took the Felony Driving While Suspended off the books to alleviate prison over crowding. Now it is just a misdemeanor.

What would be more useful and have more of an effect is to arrest the car being used and impound it. This would go a long way to prevent people loaning their cars to unlicensed drivers and/or take away the instrument that allows people to violate the law. This type of forfeiture gets people’s attention and would reduce this flagrant violation of the law…..and get these types of folks off the road.


Bundy I love the idea of impounding the offenders cars, trucks, motorcycles etc. It would also be a good idea to put liens on their property or garish their pay until they paid their debt to society. I get the feeling that a judges sentence to these offenders is nothing more than words and it will continue to be this way until they follow through on the punishment or find a different way of imposing a punishment on them.


Exactly, going to jail isn’t enough of a deterrent. Taking a car for repeat drunk drivers and suspended drivers is a step in the right direction. It shows that society is serious about keeping the streets (literally) safe and sane from people that put our lives and those of our kids at risk.


Sounds like “priorities” change depending on which community group or elected/appointed official squawks loudest. MADD shows up to court, writes letters to the editor or speaks to city council, and there’s a push for DUI patrol and maximum penalties. Same thing, I’d suspect, occurs in executive session when they discuss the need to increase city revenues. As a matter of course, all law enforcement agencies deny having “quotas,” and they’ll deny even having a “secret understanding” in the department…but we all know that officers who write the least tickets won’t get as favorable a review or performance evaluation as the gung-ho badge-heavy ones.

Anyone remember 20+ years ago when officers hid around the corner from the seminary building across from IFHS and ticketed kids all day for jaywalking? (actually, 1/2 day - word got out pretty quickly) There was no auto-pedestrian incident precipitating it…it was pure revenuing by IFPD, under the guise of “public safety.”

Remember also when IFPD hid on the numbered streets across from IFHS and radared motorists, then had officers down Holmes in either direction pull over the speeders? That in itself could be justifiable as public safety, BUT…when clever students put “WARNING - SPEED TRAP” on the marquee, IFPD stormed into the principal’s office and demanded it be taken down under threat of charging the responsible students with obstruction! I challenge anyone to deny the revenuing motivation on that one….


I’m telling you. Be careful who you are talking crap about. These people are armed and surely bored. I dare you to go talk smack to an officer’s face. They are nice people doing a great job. They are not motivated by personal interest or money. Go police!


IFHS Alumnus,

You really make it too easy to challenge your revenue theory. Did you bother to look where the money goes when you pay a citation? I’ll give you the example when a speeding citation was $62.00:

Fixed Penalty $20.50, Court Costs $16.50, County Justice Fund Fee $5.00, Peace Officers Training Fee $10.00, & ISTARS Technology Fund Fee $10.00.

So, out of all that money the only thing that would go to the law enforcement agency is $20.50. Well that’s not true either. No law enforcement agency gets that money direct. ALL of it goes into either the city, county, or state budget. The city, county, or state designates a spending budget to the agency yearly. So this refutes the need to write a lot of tickets to make the department richer.

Well there’s you’re rebuttal. Don’t make false accusations, based upon false statements, that the police pocket all the money from the tickets they write. If it ever changed to what you’re saying wouldn’t the city police drive something nicer than a ford taurus or crown victorias from the early 90’s?


Wasn’t there a program instituted a few years ago by the IFPD where the offender could “opt” for a police-sponsored driving program rather than go to court and pay a fine and all revenue from the program costs went to the IFPD?

As for not needing to write a lot of tickets for the purpose of making the department richer, I respectfully disagree. The money may go to the city coffers, but the number of tickets would be used to create a presentation to the councilman of “need” for more money, and justification by the submitter of the budget that since the funds were provided by law enforcement, the funds should be given to law enforcement. Let’s apply the opposite. What reaction do you think would result if the officers refused to issue a single citation for one month? The city council would be raising holy heck! “We need money! We need money!”


Sounds like some of you really need to see what goes on in the community you live in. Many agencies across the US participate in a “ride along” program where John Q. Public can ride with an officer and see what actually happens. It is so easy to believe that these officers just ride around in their cars, drinking their coffee, and trying to get their “quotas”. I have done rides with several different agencies. The quotas are a myth. Like a joke I got in an e-mail one time talking about things people believe with police…”sure we have a quota. Two more tickets and my wife gets a toaster.” That’s how ridiculous that theory is.
My question to the original poster is, how do you know the cop running the “speed trap” a mile away was still there while you witnessed the disturbance in your neighborhood? How can you be in two places at once? Also, what was the call volume for that day? Is it possible that all the officers on duty were tied up with other disturbances or calls that if they left, they’d be no different than what you witnessed? And for all you know, that vehicle going the wrong way could have been a suspected drunk driver or involved in an earlier crime and needed to be pulled off the streets. Law enforcement is a difficult job. Not only are you put in difficult situations of varying stress levels and have to make split second decisions to save your own life or that of another, you have to deal with the scrutiny of the public that doesn’t understand your job. I have seen what they do and know I could not do their job. if you think you can, then go apply next time a testing session comes around and try to replace the “bad apples”. Just get out there and see what they deal with. Traffic is run to keep us all obeying the law as well as a sign of officer presence. If once it got dark, every officer just stuck to patrolling neighborhoods, you’d say you never see a cop and that they’re not doing their jobs cause you don’t see them. There’s a lot to be learned from all the comments on this thread. Yes there are a few bad officers out there that make a bad image for all of those who wear the uniform. But there are good ones too who truly care about those they serve, take the time to explain things, and do their jobs properly. If you feel you’ve been treated unfairly or your neighbor does, talk to the officer’s supervisor or the chief of police so they can look into it rather than whining behind a computer to others who can’t do anything about it.


Another Guest #36:

I think Whine Whine Whine was making the rebuttal point to the funds don’t go directly to the Police Dept. which is true. Sure you make a valid point about them asking for money, but I highly doubt they are getting it.

If the Police Dept. was making the City so rich, or richer, then why did the Post Register report the police were denied the majority of what they were asking for the new yearly budget? Although I did find it humorous about the police being so poor they can’t afford decent cars. Doesn’t sound like the City Council is too generous to the police based upon what they drive.

I think you also need to see the opposite of what you were saying in regards to the officers’ not writing tickets. Not only would the City Council be mad, but so would the citizens. Citizens do actually call in and complain about where people are speeding, that they were cut off, that kids on 17th are driving wreckless.

I’m just surprised so many people consider having a quota is an injustice. How many jobs out there have quotas? Wouldn’t you want you’re police dept. to enforce the law? Isn’t that their job? I don’t know how many times this has been said on this web site, but for the police it’s damned if you do and damned if you don’t.


how much is it to get into idaho falls? my family wants to take a trip there and we cant find how much it costs!! HELP!! PLEASE!


I’m not sure I understand your question. Idaho Falls is not an amusement park. It doesn’t cost anything to “get in”. The cost to “get here” depends on where you live and whether your not you decide to drive here or fly.

Leave Your Comment
Our Community's Comment Guidelines:
  1. Please stay polite and on topic.
  2. Your email will never be published.
  3. No profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  4. No personal attacks, name-calls, put-downs, or baiting other guests, races, genders, or religions.
  5. Express opinions, facts, logic, and reasoning; just don’t argue for argument’s sake.
  6. No commercial links (unless absolutely relevant to the discussion) and no religious proselytizing.
  7. No religious discussions (for or against). Go to http://religiondebates.blogspot.com for religious discussions.
  8. Use the "I" word as much as possible to demonstrate responsibility.
  9. Limit yourself to using one name per thread to demonstrate responsibility.
  10. If you think a comment is inappropriate, ask Joe to review it.