• Share/Bookmark

Gas prices in Idaho

by Open Mind on July 30, 2008

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Blogger Post
  • MySpace

I know we’ve talked about this a LOT, but here goes again.

So the gas prices nationally are dropping, but here they’re not, at least not substantially. The excuse is that we’re not using as much gas, and there’s still expensive gas sitting in the tanks. Presumably, once the tanks are topped off with less expensive fuel, we should see the prices come down.

Is it just me and my cynicism, or am I correct in wondering why that doesn’t work in reverse? Do gas prices stay down when less expensive fuel is sitting in the tanks?

Here are a couple of links:

Channel 8’s story on the prices

Idaho gas prices

VN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Popularity: 12%

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Blogger Post
  • MySpace
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Idaho Falls Burglaries Increasing… Is it the gas prices?
  2. Will Gas Prices Ruin Vacations to Yellowstone and Jackson Hole?
  3. Find the cheapest local gas prices
  4. Map our gas prices
  5. Are there more drownings this year?

{ 33 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Anonymous July 30, 2008 at 10:01 am

Uncle Bumpy will step in and take a stab at this with the understanding that I am not and have never been employed in the oil industry, so I might be blowing smoke. I am a CPA though with a minor in Economics, for whatever that might be worth.

The first thing we have to understand is that a barrel of oil purchased today at $122 will not find its way into production for many weeks. That means the oil in the pipeline, so to speak, and at the refinery is likely oil that was purchased when the price of a barrel was $135 to $145. These companies are not going to automatically drop the price of a gallon of gas because they bought it cheaper today. They have to account for the supply in the chain.

Regarding the Channel 8 news story and the comments attached to the news story, it is clear that the average consumer has close to no understanding of the economic process, whether that be fuel or food. Just because a tanker drives up and drops of 10,000 gallons of fuel today, why would we think we should see pricing at the market rate of $122 a barrel of oil? That new load of 10,000 gallons certainly wasn’t purchased for the new price of $122 a barrle of oil either, it was purchased long ago for a price we don’t know but most likely much higher. See my paragraph above; we have to work through the supply at the refinery and distribution levels of the old stock before we see a drop in pricing at the local levels when the new stock arrives.

Look at it like this – Southwest Airlines has been able to be profitable this entire time of high fuel costs because they hedged and purchased their fuel long ago at prices that were in effect at the time. So if a gas station buys 10,000 gallons of gas at $3.90 to sell for $4.00, so be it. That next 10,000 gallon load may well be $3.95 or it could be $3.80 depending on how many gallons were purchased for future delivery.

It was what, a week before July 4th holiday (please correct if wrong) before Idaho Falls saw $4 gas? I was in Michigan in mid May and they were already at $4 and above. I was in Southwest Texas in mid June and they were paying $4.24 a gallon then. I returned to Idaho Falls in the third week of June and still only paid $3.89 a gallon to fill up. Now on the flip side, I checked with a contact in Michigan just before writing this and they are down to $3.84 and falling weekly, where the corner gas station where I live is still at $4.07.

I personally believe that the gas companies in the area are going to do what they can to squeeze the last penny out of a crappy summer season. Tourism is down to the parks, and I am of the thought that a lot of gas companies have future purchases of xxxx’s of gallons of gas they are still obligated for whether they have the business now or not. As stated earlier, those future gas loads are at a higher price for a barrel of oil than the $122 we are at today.

And finally, I still maintain the energy issues are not a supply and demand issue, they are the lack of a national energy policy issue. Problem is, as we work our way down to cheaper fuel prices and the impact to our wallets is less and less, we tend to forget the pain and go back to our old habits.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
2 CR67 July 30, 2008 at 10:52 am

One must also remember we were one of the last states to have the price go over the 4 dollar mark. So it’s only fair to be one of the last to fall under the 4 dollar mark.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
3 Bundy July 31, 2008 at 10:20 pm

Follow Obama’s lead to save gas and avoid drilling…………just inflate your tires more and get tune ups.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzZNP4tTfV0

When you finish picking your jaw off the floor please let me know what you think of the Senator’s plan.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
4 Guest House August 1, 2008 at 8:28 am

Just one more reason we don’t want this man in the White House!! What a quack! (and yes, I called him a “quack” so don’t jump on my case about it)
Seriously, inflating your tires and tuning up your car?? Yeah, he qualifys as a “quack”! :)

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
5 hmm August 1, 2008 at 2:56 pm

And exactly what is McCain’s plan? From everything I’ve read, it’s simply a plan to make the rich even richer, not to help anyone else. Can you show me something that diverts from this well known fact? You can make all the jabs at Obama that you wish to, but it still isn’t making McCain look good.

Which again, is why for the past several years, I always seem to cast my vote for the lesser of two evils.

Making fun of Obama isn’t good enough without some proof that McCain can do better. I haven’t seen it.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
6 loud-proud-hippie August 3, 2008 at 8:21 am

Inflating your tires to the proper level and keeping your vehicle in good running condition (not driving around with the “check engine” light on) are actually pretty good ideas when it comes to gas saving. So is going under sixty on the highway (a thing I’m not willing to do) as is buying a hybrid (a thing I’m not able to afford), as is riding a bike whenever you can (I do that). There are lots of simple ideas that together a person can combine and make into decent gas savings. Can EVERYBODY choose all of these? Likely no, but hey, if you can drive slower to save gas – have at it! – or if you want to check your tire pressure regularly for maximum efficiency – good!

I’m not sure why Obama’s suggestions make him a duck. McCain’s suggestions included giving a few million dollars to anybody who comes up with an energy plan. Is he less of a quacker? I’m trying to understand why suggesting an idea or two qualifies somebody as a waterfowl.

I heard that gas prices are dropping in Rigby. It might filter down here soon. I don’t know – I haven’t bought gas in over a month (I used to drive a lot, now I’m lucky – at the moment – to be able to go days without driving, I ‘mride my bike almost everywhere, for as long as I can).

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
7 Caleb August 4, 2008 at 9:25 pm

Okay. For the skeptic who thinks Obama is in la-la land when it comes to saving all that gas and oil by inflating tires, tune-ups, etc. Please pick your stupid jaw or whatever it is off the floor and read this, from ragingred.wordpress.com:

“How much oil could Americans save if we all took measures like properly inflating our tires, getting regular tune-ups, regularly changing our air filters, and driving more efficiently? The answer:

Using current numbers from the Bush DOE and EPA , the answer appears to be some 2.5 to 3 million barrels a day — 20 times what could be found if we ended the congressional moratorium on offshore drilling and three times the oil we are likely to find in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.”

Anyone who laughs and scoffs at this is simply too lazy to work and help the country through our energy crisis. You deserve nothing.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
8 Guest of a Guest August 4, 2008 at 9:51 pm

I hardly think every car on the road has low tire pressure or needs a tune up. Get realistic here!

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
9 easterner August 5, 2008 at 11:20 am

“Please pick your stupid jaw or whatever it is off the floor. . . ”

what can this possibly mean? ( I tried to italicize “whatever it is” but couldn’t.)

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
10 loud-proud-hippie August 5, 2008 at 1:36 pm

I just heard that by having properly inflated tires and a sound-running engine, one might expect to save twelve cents per gallon on gas.

If we drill offshore, we will save six cents (in twenty years).

I don’t know the source of those stats, so I can’t tell you how valid it is, but the source from which I heard this is a valid source which is typically right on the money.

I’m still wondering why Obama walks like a duck for suggesting this. When I was in college and taking an engine re-building class, this idea (checking tire pressure and maintaining clean-running engines) was promoted as a way to keep a car healthy as well as a great way to save on gas. Maybe Obama went to the same college I did? (No, of course not, sillies.)

:)

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
11 hmm August 5, 2008 at 5:42 pm

Loud proud hippie and Caleb, I appreciate the posts. I have always been told that regular tune ups and properly inflated tires were the key to not only saving gas, but increasing the life of your vehicle. It’s a win-win no matter how you view it.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
12 Nemesis August 5, 2008 at 6:48 pm

Yup. Let’s see. Good common sense that helps me save money and extend the life of my car whether there’s an energy crisis or not. But wait…Obama suggested it, as if it was a viable option? Well now I might just let my tires go semi-flat and my engine get dirty in protest. How dare he suggest this is something I should do???

Dang, I’m annoyed at him for thinking this was a reasonable plan.

BTW, easterner, I think #7 Caleb was referencing #3 Bundy’s comment “When you finish picking your jaw off the floor please let me know what you think of the Senator’s plan”

I haven’t yet read both plans, and I hope to do so before I comment as to my opinion of either one. But if there are common sense tips in them, I’m not going to ignore them if I don’t like the candidate. I might ignore them because I’m lazy and stupid, but that’s a whole ‘nuther issue that I will have to find a way to work around. (‘Cuz then, the energy crisis would be the least of my worries!) ;-)

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
13 Bundy August 5, 2008 at 9:48 pm

Barack Obama — fighting to keep us ignorant

It’s unfortunate that, at least until this Friday, Barack Obama opposed off-shore drilling. Still, this is a policy issue on which reasonable people probably can differ and certainly could before gasoline prices skyrocketed. But, Obama has also led a one-man crusade to keep the American people ignorant about what’s at stake in the debate over off-shore drilling. This is almost criminal. For it implies that there is no set of facts under which we should ever consider drilling off-shore. The absurdity of that position, always apparent, is confirmed by Obama’s willingness to flip on the issue.

Here’s the background. In 2005, Congress considered energy legislation that included an off-shore inventory. The inventory would provide an estimate of our off-shore reserves. Taking it wouldn’t mean drilling; it would just tell us what’s out there. Yet Obama voted to kill the off-shore inventory provision. So, unfortunately, did John McCain. However, the effort to kill the inventory failed, and the first inventory report was issued in February 2006.

Obama, though, did not give up in his efforts to keep the public ignorant. In January 2007, he proposed legislation to eliminate the authorization to conduct the inventory, as established in the 2005 law. Obama’s bill is S. 115. The key provision is section 101(a)(5). It provides that “Section 357 (42 U.S.C. 15912) (relating to comprehensive inventory of OCS oil and natural gas resources)” is “repealed as of the date of enactment of this act.” It’s my understanding that Obama is the only sponsor of this legislation. Here is the link:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-115

Ironically, Obama called his legislation “The Oil SENSE Act.” How audacious a label for an act that would deprive the public of key information relevant to deciding whether off-shore drilling makes sense. As far as I know, Obama’s legislation is still pending.

It’s wonderful that Obama now thinks it might be ok to drill off-shore, provided that such drilling is part of an “overarching really thoughtful” energy package. Perhaps now, as part of the package, Obama will stop opposing an inventory of our off-shore energy assets. After all, if Obama is prepared to support drilling, he no longer needs to keep voters in the dark about what we are losing by not drilling.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
14 CR67 August 6, 2008 at 8:31 am

Good comment Bundy.
If you need a politician to tell you to keep your vehicle in good running order, than you’ve got much deeper issues than the price you’re paying for fuel. imo
It’s common sense people comeon! But then again common sense is rare in this day and age. (not implying the lack thereof towards anyone here…just for the record)

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
15 NRG August 6, 2008 at 9:20 am

Barack Obama has taken some undeserved criticism for suggesting that people properly inflate their tires and keep their cars tuned. I think those are valid suggestions. But if you don’t buy into that, maybe you will think John McCain’s solutions are better. In April of this year he recommended turning the lights out 5 minutes earlier and not driving that extra block.

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/16454.html

I’m curious whether those who were critical of Obama’s position will feel the same regarding McCain’s. Somehow I doubt it.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
16 Nemesis August 6, 2008 at 5:16 pm

NRG #15, thanks for reminding us that Obama is much like McCain in suggesting some common sense ideas.

CR67 #14, sometimes folks don’t realize or remember some of the common sense things that you appear to know and take for granted. And if they are reminded of them, and the potential impacts of those little things, sometimes they will feel good knowing there are many easy baby steps they can take to help out.

Someone should remind us, it may as well be someone we’re turning to for leadership in energy policy and plans.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
17 Bundy August 6, 2008 at 8:21 pm

We need the government to remind us not to eat Big Mac’s too. The mind is truly a terrible thing to waste, but at least we have the government to help us out. Whew, and I was worried because I almost forgot to eat because Big Brother wasn’t around to tell me how to eat some Tofu instead of fat McDonald’s sandwiches.

I am also glad that the government can help me save some more gas and be more efficient……seriously, while educating the public is fine, when we use these teachable moments as a replacement for real action that will increase supply and drive down oil speculation (and prices) I have a problem with that. There is no way that Obama’s math adds up.

Just for fun, I did the math. Properly inflating your tires can improve gas mileage by 3%. Of course, many people already keep their tires at the proper inflation level, and many more are at least close to being properly inflated. Let’s be kind and assume that one-half of the total possible savings would be realized if we all inflated our tires properly; that’s a net gain of 1.5% fuel efficiency.

Americans drive approximately 2,880 billion miles per year by estimates from AAA. If we average 24 mpg, we use around 120 billion gallons of gasoline in our vehicles. If, through the perfect tire inflation, we improved our overall fuel efficiency by 1.5%, that would be 1.8 billion gallons. A barrel of oil produces around 20 gallons of gasoline, so the total savings available through tire inflation is approximately 90 million barrels of oil annually.

How does this stack up against “all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling?”

ANWR: 10 billion barrels
Outer Continental Shelf: 18 billion barrels (estimated; the actual total is much higher, since exploration has been banned)
Oil shale: 1 trillion barrels

So, on the above assumptions, it would take only 11,308 YEARS OF OIL PRODUCTION to equal “all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling.”

Obama is a curious case. He gives the impression of being a smart guy, but through his unscripted comments we have learned that he knows little about history, science or mathematics. He also seems rather shockingly short on common sense, as this most recent gaffe illustrates.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
18 Guest August 6, 2008 at 11:52 pm

Unless the Republicans can rig another election, it is obvious a 46 year old man will beat a 72 year old man for president. Neither would be a great president, but McCain is clearly the greater of these two evils.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
19 qwest to arm August 7, 2008 at 12:25 am

I think Idahoans are being ripped off at the pump by scam artist and its fraudulent I think the Government needs to get off its lazy butt and do something about it. I think there needs to be harsh penalties to the parties responsible for our gas prices being way higher than the national average. I think someone owes all of Idaho a big fat refund check.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
20 CR67 August 7, 2008 at 8:08 am

But you’re assuming that EVERYONE will go out and inflate their tires and tune up their cars. (BOP alert!!!) That’s just not realistic. Thats like asking murders to stop murdering or sexual predators to stop preying on innocent people, it just won’t happen. If everyone did what they were supposed to do, life on this planet would be completely different. But the fact is, not everyone WILL do these things and to presume that they will, is just foolish thinking imo. So Obama, keep your little tire gauges to yourself, it’s a ridiculous idea!!

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
21 NRG August 7, 2008 at 9:14 am

I think that both Obama & McCain were trying to make the point that people could take at least a little personal responsibility for energy consumption. I think they both have a good point.

If Obama’s recommendation is ridiculous isn’t McCain’s idea just as ridiculous? I don’t see the same ridicule being directed toward McCain as Obama.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
22 Anonymous August 7, 2008 at 12:24 pm

NRG, haven’t you heard, McCain isn’t democrat. Therefore, he cannot be ridiculous. ;)

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
23 GofaG August 7, 2008 at 12:37 pm

Nobody should be surprised at either candidates flip flopping. It’s the same old mud slinging and flip flopping that happens every election with every candidate.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
24 CafeDelSol August 9, 2008 at 8:15 am

Channel 8 didn’t do a very good job researching gas prices. The entire state of Idaho is not significantly higher than the national average. Northern Idaho has dropped much more than the south. Their prices are over 20 cents per gallon cheaper than ours (around $3.85 last week). East Idaho is usually the last area to lower prices but it takes these jerks about two microseconds to RAISE prices when oil goes up.

We need to start demanding answers from the local distributors. Maybe picketing the major offender’s stations would grab their attention. This is not simply an issue of a few businesses keeping their profits up – it’s a matter of national security since gas prices affect the ENTIRE ECONOMY.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
25 mco53 August 10, 2008 at 12:52 am

Local gas station owners have little control over gas prices, that is if they want to stay in business. It’s not like station owners buy gas for $3.50 and have to decide if they want to sell it for $4.00 or $4.25. There just isn’t that kind of money in gas. Station owners barely make anything, if anything on gas. This is a fact. I’m speaking on 7 years personal experience and industry statistics. One of the main reasons I sold in 2007 was because of diminishing gas margins.

The big oil companies are the ones making record-breaking profits. Billions of dollars in just 3 months. Exxon (remember this is just one oil company) made 40.6 billion in 2007 breaking a record for profits of any US public company in history. The previous record holder – Exxon. In 2008 they made 11.7 billion in 3 just months, again on track to smash its own record. They made $1,300 per second. I’m all for free enterprise but what’s happening right now with gas and oil should be a crime.

Then there are the speculators and traders that buy and sell oil like its a game. Say oil is at $100 a barrel now. They buy it for $105 because they think they can sell it for $110. Another guy buys it for $110 because he thinks he can sell it for $115, and on and on. Each guy making money off the next. This gives you a general idea of what kind of game they’re playing. The price of oil ends up at say $140 when genuine supply and demand should make it only $100. These trust fund babies and their inner circles make billions while Joe Schmo needs to cut down on other necessities just to make it back and forth to work.

These are the “jerks” CafeDelSol, not local gas station owners. When I owned my station, like many other small business owners, I worked long hours. Minimum 50-60 hour weeks. Twelve hour days. All I’m saying is I wouldn’t have done that if I was making a killing off gas. There was no price gouging. I know many station owners and I’m in the majority.

Back to the original post by Open Mind. Too much importance is placed on national averages. So, so many variables go into figuring out the cost of gas. State tax is one of them. Total taxes range from 26 cents to 62 cents per gallon. That’s just one variable. As far as gas prices going up faster than they go down. There is some truth to that. Again, there are just too many variables to try and explain exactly why that happens. But I can tell you this. When gas prices go up fast, most stations lose money. A station would be lucky to be making more than a penny or two in those situations. It’s when prices go down that some of that is recouped, therefore the slower drop in prices. Like I mentioned at the beggining, station owners have little control over gas prices. They have a price they have to pay like consumers do and that price can change daily. They are not making a killing. They usually make the same whether gas sells for $2.20 or $4.50, in fact they might make more at $2.20. It’s the up and down that creates chaos.

Every single gas station owner in the nation wants gas to sell for less, it’s in their best interest. 100% guaranteed.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
26 Nemesis August 10, 2008 at 4:41 am

I keep hearing every time about the poor gas station owners, how terrible the business is and how it’s just awful for them.

So why are they continuing to stay in business? Why not just do something else? New gas stations are opening all the time, but why, if the bottom line is so bad?

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
27 CafeDelSol August 10, 2008 at 7:21 am

I was referring to distributors not station owners. The distributors obtain their gas the same places as everyone else so I’m sick of hearing the sob stories stating, “we bought too much gas at higher prices so we can’t lower the prices yet”. I find it hard to believe they are so consistently incompetent in their business planning tactics. Yes the oil companies and speculators are the main culprits in raising prices nationally but when one area is always so far out of sync with the rest of the state, something is rotten.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
28 mco53 August 10, 2008 at 8:33 am

Nemisis, it’s not about the “poor station owners,” and feeling sorry for them. Just pointing out the fact that they don’t make a tons of money on gas, like some still believe. I know many people have realized this over the past few years since prices started to sky rocket, but this is for the few that are still out there, like yourself. Most people work hard for their paychecks, not just gas station owners – no need for sympathy.
You’re right, the bottom line isn’t that terrible. They still make some money on cigarettes, candy, etc. otherwise nobody would be in this business. Just saying it’s not in the gas.

CafeDelSol, I generally agree with you. One thing about price variation when comparing in-state sales that I can understand is the delivery costs. There are pipelines and of course trucks (which run on these ridiculously high gas prices) that factor in.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
29 Just Wondering August 10, 2008 at 9:50 am

Do people remember that we were one of the last states to go above $4/gallon when prices were skyrocketing?

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
30 Nemesis August 10, 2008 at 10:07 am

Just Wondering #29…I remember it and my buddy CR67 mentioned it in comment #2 on this thread.

We were lots lower than others and got the higher prices long afterwards. So maybe there’s something wack about our distribution methods that makes us have considerable lag time in the rise and fall of the fuel prices.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
31 Nemesis August 10, 2008 at 10:09 am

Thanks for the clarification, my bad, #27 CafeDelSol and #28 mco53.

I appreciate the explanations, they make sense to me now.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
32 Marcus November 17, 2008 at 9:43 am

$2.09 at the Maverik on 1st and Woodruff this morning. Keep on fallin’ ;) .

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
33 CR67 November 17, 2008 at 9:54 am

Amen to that! I got gas there this wknd. What’s funny is, I kept waiting and only putting in 5-10 dollars at a time because that station (& most in the city) have been steadily dropping their prices each week for the past 6 weeks or so. I didn’t want to fill up at 2.69 when I figured it would drop to 2.49 in a week. Sure enough, 3 weeks later here we are at 2.09.
I recall somebody saying in the chatbox a couple months ago that we’d never again see gas below 3 dollars a gallon. HA! Bet their eating some tasty crow pie about now. The great thing is, there are places around the country that are below 2 bucks a gallon, so that’s something to look forward to.

UN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Note: If you submit a comment and do not see it displayed, it may have falsely triggered the automatic anti-spam system for reasons beyond your control. Your comment will appear after it's approved by a moderator (usually within 24 hours or less). There is no need to rewrite and/or submit your comment again unless it still doesn't appear 24 hours later.

Previous post:

Next post: