Local news media accept biased message over conflicting video evidence

I watched the video’s on CNN. A couple of things were very clear.

1. The video surveillance camera is one of those that takes pictures every couple of seconds. You can tell by the constant flickering you see. That easily can account for why you don’t see a plane if the plane happened to crash during the interval between frames.

2. There were two videos. In the second one in the frame just before the explosion you can see something come into the picture on the very far right. I couldn’t tell what it was because I could never get it paused long enough to tell but there was definitely something there. It could have been a plane, it could have been a missle. But clearly there is something there.

Yes, the videos are not a normal feed (what is it like 24 frames per second), but probably a frame a second.

The frame before the explosion shows just a tiny white glimmer. As you said, it could be the start of a plane, a missle (though I doubt they are white), or quite likely just blurry pixels painted into the video after the fact to make viewers think it is a plane entering the frame.

Two things are most suspicious:

1-I can possibly accept the plane is going so fast it could clip right through our field of view, except for the initial explosion frame, you can clearly see the first fireball going up only ten or twenty feet, yet we do not see even a hint of tail setion sticking out. That seems unreal.

2-The loose change video I linked to (take the red pill) demonstrates there were three cameras trained on the pentagon on 9/11. The military is releasing the two with the worst viewing angles. There is another video that shows a much wider and frontal view of the impact, and would seem much better able to put these theories to rest if it were released. Why won’t they release that video?

One last suspicious thing the loose change video points out, is that a day or two before the attacks something photographed the area over and there is a strange white streak painted across the lawn on the EXACT trajectory the plane took into the building.

Ask yourself this basic question: If a cruise missle hit the Pentagon instead of Flight 77, then what happened to Flight 77.

Then read the following…

http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77w.htm

but WHO was hit with the crazy missle? i’ve seen some plane wrecks up close and personal like and never hav e i seen the plane completely evaporate. always a tail and wings at least.

Most conspiracy theories are shakey at best. Yes, there are some inconsistacies with the official version of events, but I’ve come to expect that from this administration.

In viewing these new videos that talk about a conspiracy, notice that they are very selective about WHICH eyewitness accounts they use and WHICH videos they show.

The truth, I’m sure, is somewhere in the middle.

We are currently engaged in a world war that, I beleive, in ten years time from now, will make Emperor Hirohito and Adolph Hitler look like Pooh & Tigger. It is my opinion that matters are likely to elevate to an apocalyptic proportion largely because we are forced to confront two enemies simultaneously, in two theaters of operation: 1) Against the Muslim fascists in civilian clothing embedded in every nook and cranny of planet earth that are entirely and wholly dedicated to the utter destruction of all things non-Muslim. And 2) Against irrational, snivvling, spineless, equivocates of the Official Stench ilk who have appointed themselves protectors of my freedoms. I never asked for there \”help\”, and I\’m here to tell you, they are increasing our jepordy in a troubled world with thier perpetual impedeiments to doing that which must be done. — —– (edited by site admin), Official Stench, whoever you are.