Idaho Falls Beltway is probably too far away

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to the newsletter or RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

I have heard a few people talk about building a beltway around Idaho Falls. For those of you not familiar with the urban planning term, a beltway is basically a freeway that wraps around a city in a circle. They are usually added to poorly planned cities where traffic has become unbearable. Instead of taking freeways in and out of the city, you take one around to the other side.

The idea is a good one. Anyone who has been to Boise and used their awesome downtown connector (actually I-184 but called “The Connector”) can appreciate how traffic is improved afterwards. Idaho Falls is getting big enough that it can take 30 minutes to get from the airport to Ammon at certain times of the day.


Unfortunately, I have not seen our local officials begin to purchase the land necessary to build a beltway. It would have to wrap around Idaho Falls by way along Sunnyside, around Ammon, along Crowley, and back to the freeway along Iona Road because of all the new neighborhoods that have sprouted up.

Cities around the nation have rolled up their sleeves to buy and make way through dense urban jungles for their beltways. Boise likely had to break some eggs to build their connector from downtown to I-84. Idaho Falls could still make a beltway happen, but it would require more land owner cooperation than we typically see in Bonneville County or more bullying than our local officials are used to doing. Just look at how many years the Sunnyside project has been overdue, and that won’t be done for another two years.

One thing is certain if a beltway were constructed around Idaho Falls. An economic explosion would occur all along the beltway exits all the way around Idaho Falls, and our fair city would be probably double or triple in size within a few years. A beltway will portend much more growth, and our planning officials need to plan very carefully for this.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

I am convinced that a beltway for the Idaho Falls area is not oly overdue, but if we continue to brag about our unemployment rates, especially with the Mayor of Idaho Falls professing to improve the city without rasing taxes, our infrastructure has to change to accomidate it. Not having a beltway for the city of Idaho Falls is only contributing to our traffic problem; wich is only planning to get worse as our community leaders drag their feet. They say that they cannot afford to build a beltway around the area to improve traffic for the purposes of improving our infrastructure, yet they totally ignore the massive COMMERCIAL ENTITIES THAT ARE SERIOUSLY LOOKING TO BUILD IN THIS AREA; WHICH COULD EASILY PICK-UP THE SLACK! I guess If the citizens of the community could shovel a couple thousand dollars into these cities leaders pockets, maybe they could get their brains to start working!!!


As far as I have heard, the only major bump in the road for a few companies was that the city couldn’t give an exact time for “total” completion of the Sunnyside Road project. Now that the final piece will be done by summer/fall next year, these same companies will probably renew their interest in relocating/expanding here.


The Idaho Falls Beltway is already under construction from what I gather. It starts at Sunnyside, moves north to Hitt and eventually to Iona Road where it connects to US 20. Not your average beltway by any means but I get the gist of it. Sooner or later though these patchwork projects will not be sufficent enough for our growing metro.

New metro census numbers have been released for 2006 and has Idaho Falls sitting at 117,000 people. This is up 15% from 2006 and makes the IF Metro #3 in the state in terms of population just behind Couer D’ Alene, and there are no signs of the growth slowing any time soon.

There are a few infrastructure improvements in the area to “brag” about in the meantime though. Lincoln Road is getting widened and new curb/gutter and water and sewer mains are being installed out to Hitt Road. Woodruff Avenue between the Moody Canal and Lincoln is finally going to be 5 lanes wide. And Ammon is going to upgrade it’s water and sewer systems. Also Southern Bonneville and Northern Bingham counties are pooling their resources to build the regional wastewater treatment plant, which will in turn cause a boom in development in that area.

It’s not really fair to say that infrastructure improvements are not taking place, but rather on a scale of importance which ones are being put on the backburner.

Growth in the area is at 15%, that is 12% higher than what was expected for the area only a few years ago so to say the planning wasn’t being done is false, planning was being done for 3% growth not 15%.

Look for alot of big announcements in the near future that pertain to not only retail/commercial interest but industrial and residential as well. Remember that this area is only at the cusp of a boom, we haven’t really seen anything yet.


When I think of beltway, I think of a freeway road system that circles a town, not a wide 2-lane road with stoplights every mile.

Are you saying the ‘beltway’ is being widened and prepped for the day they can remove stoplights and increase the speeds on it?

Those are some neat-sounding developments you talk about.


Maybe in about 100 yrs we might need a beltway


I agree with the views above that think the time to get working on a beltway is now. Every city that builds them is always behind the traffic counts once they are done.

For example, in metro Salt Lake City, (1 million people in Salt Lake County alone), the existing beltway is not adequate, which is why the Legacy Highway, and essentially a second beltway going through Draper and Riverton is seriously being discussed. Plus, the “express train,” (whatever it is named), that will use existing railroad tracks for a light commuter train from Provo to eventually Brigham City, is already in the process of building the connecting tracks.

Utah is almost playing double catch up so-to-speak, if the combined metro population of Utah County (Provo and Orem at ~ 650,000), Salt Lake County and Davis/Weber Counties (at ~ 300,000+) are combined.

Not only is the population of SL County underserved, so is the metro area. Close to 1.8 - 1.9 million residents use the established highways, interstates and existing beltway of the Wasatch Front metro area. Planners grossly underestimated the growth.

I know of a private company who is building an upscale store between Post Falls and Spokane. The company is paying for the freeway exit. So I think there is merit in reviewing options and sources of payment.

And, Dnix0112 is right as far as I know. This year (2007) should have a number of important announcements about new commercial and companies who want to do business in eastern ID. It’s just a matter of time (and potentially some re-zoning in the case of Sunnyside Crossroads Regional Center) to get the construction started.

One key change that note everyone may be aware of, developers now say that local government is working with them in partnership. I’m repeating what I read in a great article about the growth in Idaho Falls.

Apparently, there use to be “issues” with some government officials. I don’t know to whom those developers were referring. I’m only glad things are better now!

I absolutely think the time is NOW to be planning the belt loop. As I’ve driven belt loops in other cities, they have no traffic lights or stops in other form. I do tell people the Idaho Falls Metro area can have traffic jams at the wrong time of the day. It can easily take 30 minutes to get from the west to eastside as mentioned earlier.

I hope the government and potentially some developers who are interested in seeing Idaho Falls grow more will read this thread. I hope they realize that local citizens are concerned about what most likely will be continued growth.

Let’s grow “smart” instead of piece by piece.


A couple weekends ago I biked from the western edge of city limits to nearly the eastern edge in about 30 minutes. It’s a sad fact of our traffic that sometimes it takes as long to drive across our city as it does to bike.

The more I think about it, the less it’s likely or even possible to transform Sunnyside/Hitt/Iona road into a true beltway. Setting aside all the access road issues (and having to install on/off ramps in our crowded city), think of all those new Sunnyside island businesses (a single building ‘floating’ in the middle of a parking lot sea) that have individual access to Sunnyside.

If Idaho Falls really wanted to plan for growth, we should think bigger. Design and plan (i.e. purchase land) for a beltway that runs east-west between Sunnyside and Telford, then north between Crowley and the next road out towards the foothills, then connecting at U.S. 20 and turning that into a beltway extension coming back into IF; staying a normal highway going out to Swan Valley.

And for goodness sake, do the beltway right with on and off ramps, not the more dangerous highways like U.S. 20 is now.

“Maybe in about 100 yrs we might need a beltway”

Mark those words. I’ll bet within 10 years (by 2017) locals are talking seriously about it and wishing it had been done sooner.


Idaho Falls is already messed up given that is was clearly designed by a bunch of guys on a weekend bender. Look at all the street that change names. Look at the old part of the city that runs at an angle compared to the rest. Look at how the north south divider for addresses is 1st street in some parts of town, Broadway in others, and Market Street (no longer exists, you have to draw an imaginary line in your mind where it used to exist to understand the numbering in a certain part of town). Then try to figure out how you can have the 100 block of south Skyline on one side of Broadway and the 600 block on North Skyline on the other side and try to not have your brain explode. Or how in certain parts of town you have both even and odd numbered houses on the SAME side of the street. Or how on some streets houses are out of order numerically. I pity anyone new to the area trying to find their way around.

Its already too late for a beltway. IF is doomed to be a mess for the rest of time. Pessimistic yes but realistic too.


Idaho Falls is not alone in haphazard development over the years. A buddy in Menan has the same house number on his neighbor’s home as his.

Do we want a rigid boring grid layout like Tucson, or a more interesting flow like Phoenix?

I agree the Anderson/Lincoln naming has to be resolved to one or the other.

As for getting around, I think the problem we have is a result of our haphazard street signs (like the zoo signs direct you to keep going past the zoo). I’ve seen an example of what some of the new signs might look like and when deployed should be a huge improvement in communicating how to get around IF.

When. deployed.


I think a beltway, or at least a connector (with on/off ramps) linking I15 to Ammon is a great idea and will be needed in the near future. Similar sized towns in other states, such as Texas for example, have beltways circling the metro area to relieve city traffic. I think a connector starting at or around Exit 113 and ending at Hitt or Ammon Road would be sufficient to alleviate much of the congestion and provide quick access to Ammon. Perhaps that would be more realistic and doable than a full loop.
Another improvement that I feel will be a must in the years to come is an upgrade to the I15 off ramp to Highway 20. Even now that exit can get backed up at times. Just imagine what it will be like in 10-15 years. I think ramps will be needed there in the future to provide a non-stop transition between roadways.
Of course all this costs a pretty penny, but it’s only going to get more expensive the longer it gets put off.


I’ve been all over Texas and this country and there aren’t too many “similar sized towns” that have a beltway around them. Towns like Dallas, Houston, etc. do of course. But Idaho Falls is much too small for a beltway. Ammon is easily accessed off or Hwy 20 and the 25th/Hitt street exit. It’s also another reason they widened Sunnyside to 4 lanes. There’s just no need for it.
As it is, it only takes 10-15 minutes tops to make it to Ammon from either Sunnyside Exit off I-15 or 25th st exit off of Hwy 20.


I think the problem with this idea is when we really need the beltway in 30 or 40 years, the whole region will be so full of developments that constructing the beltway will be prohibitively expensive. It would still be expensive now, but not nearly what the cost will be in the future when we need it.

A big part of the cost would have to be shouldered by Ammon, in my opinion. This project would benefit their city quite a bit, since it would send traffic their way more than anything. This project would also be in their best interest to pursue, because as Idaho Falls grows to the south we will choke off Ammon from the freeway. I say this meaning not literally but that our city’s growth will cause congestion which increases the time to travel from freeway to Ammon.

Maybe Ammon pays 1/3, Iona pays 1/4, and Idaho Falls pays the 5/12 remainder.


You’ve got a point there. I don’t think Ammon really wants to grow as a city though. I’ve always considered Ammon a kind of suburb of Idaho Falls, and I think that’s how they want to keep it. Unless a bunch of folks start selling off their land to the state, to build this thing. It just so happens that the little shopping area around Edwards Theatre are just that. I guess I just don’t picture them building up Ammon with more strip malls and shopping centers. I guess we’ll see in 20-30 years.
And Joe….you may be back from Texas by then! 8)

Leave Your Comment
Our Community's Comment Guidelines:
  1. Please stay polite and on topic.
  2. Your email will never be published.
  3. No profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  4. No personal attacks, name-calls, put-downs, or baiting other guests, races, genders, or religions.
  5. Express opinions, facts, logic, and reasoning; just don’t argue for argument’s sake.
  6. No commercial links (unless absolutely relevant to the discussion) and no religious proselytizing.
  7. No religious discussions (for or against). Go to http://religiondebates.blogspot.com for religious discussions.
  8. Use the "I" word as much as possible to demonstrate responsibility.
  9. Limit yourself to using one name per thread to demonstrate responsibility.
  10. If you think a comment is inappropriate, ask Joe to review it.